371: BANGLADESHI TANGO WITH CHINA

 

Pic Courtesy: Internet

 

Over the past five years, a significant improvement in areas of economic and defence cooperation has been observed between Bangladesh and China.

 

China has been following the policy of generous economic assistance, gaining considerable support within Bangladesh, both politically and among the general public.

 

Bangladesh is tending to become more authoritarian in recent times. China’s unwavering support for the government has also played a pivotal role in fostering this alignment. On the other hand emphasis on democratic values by the USA has strained their relations to some extent.

 

Deepening Economic Cooperation

 

Trade. Since 2017, Bangladesh has deepened its engagement with China. China has become Bangladesh’s largest trading partner.

 

Infrastructure. China has already invested around USD $9.75 billion in transportation projects in Bangladesh (including ongoing initiatives such as the Padma Bridge Rail Link, Bangabandhu Tunnel, and Dasher Kandi Sewerage Treatment Plant, etc).

 

FDI. China has also emerged as the largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Bangladesh. It has also ranked as the top foreign investor in Bangladesh in 2022, with 104 investors operating in eight export-processing zones.

 

Duty-Free Access. From July 2020, China has granted duty-free access to 97 per cent (later increased further) of Bangladeshi products entering its market. This proved to be a significant development in bilateral trade relations.

 

Stronger Defence Ties

 

Arms Import. Bangladesh’s military partnership with China has also grown significantly and it has become China’s second-largest arms customer, after Pakistan.

 

Defence Cooperation. Defence cooperation between the two countries also includes military personnel training in China and collaboration in defence production.

 

Naval Capability Enhancement. In 2016, Bangladesh acquired submarines from China. In March 2023, Bangladesh’s Prime Minister unveiled the country’s submarine base (Constructed by China), named BNS Sheikh Hasina, in Cox’s Bazar. The facility has the capacity to accommodate six submarines and several warships. Currently, two Chinese-made submarines are stationed at the base, representing a significant development in Bangladesh’s naval capabilities.

 

Air Force Contract. China has recently signed a contract to supply 23 Hongdu K-8W intermediate training jets to the Bangladesh Air Force, further bolstering their military cooperation.

 

Geopolitical Aspects

 

Tug of war. In the post-COVID period and during the Russia-Ukraine war, geopolitical tension in the Indo-Pacific has also increased. Both China and the United States want Bangladesh in their camp.

 

Push and Pull. The United States had invited Bangladesh to join its Indo-Pacific Strategy, as a partner in the Indo-Pacific region. In response, China had warned that Bangladesh’s relations with China would be damaged if it joins the Quad, while also seeking Bangladesh’s participation in its Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative.

 

Strains. Bangladesh’s shift towards China, coupled with concerns over its dismissal of democratic values and human rights, has strained its relationship with the United States.

 

Drifting Apart. The international community has criticized the conduct of the 2014 and 2018 elections under the Awami League government. In response to human rights violations, the United States has imposed sanctions and implemented visa restrictions on individuals undermining democratic processes. Exclusion from the Biden Democracy Summit indicates a change in U.S. policy towards Bangladesh.

 

Pains and Gains. While the United States distances itself from the Awami League government, China is extending financial support and strengthening ties with Bangladesh.

 

Russian Angle. Russia is with China to counter the US influence in Bangladesh. Bangladesh and Russia have reached an agreement to use the Chinese yuan for payment in a nuclear power plant project (objected to by the USA).

 

Rohingya Crisis. The Rohingya crisis in Bangladesh poses a significant challenge to China’s geopolitical interests in the region. A peaceful resolution to this crisis, led by China, could further solidify its influence and foothold in Bangladesh. On the other hand, the United States has also taken steps to address the crisis, with the likelihood of an increase in its presence and influence in Bangladesh. The resolution of the Rohingya crisis holds implications for the geopolitical dynamics in the region, impacting the interests of both China and the United States.

 

Analytical Implications.

 

All key stakeholders in the Indo-Pacific such as the United States, China, Russia, Japan, and India are major development partners for Bangladesh.

 

Bangladesh’s shift towards China strained relations with the United States, and interests from India and Russia highlight the complex geo-political dynamics.

 

The choices made by Bangladesh in its alliances will have significant implications for its development and security. It will also have a far-reaching effect on the geopolitical dynamics of the region.

 

Through cooperation with Bangladesh, Beijing is also expanding its footprint in the Indo-Pacific.

 

Bangladesh’s increasing military partnership with China is encouraging anti-India sentiment in Bangladesh and will also put pressure on India.

 

Learning from Chinese engagement and its adverse effects, on other countries, Bangladesh will have to play with fire with caution.

 

Bottom Line

India should not lose Bangladesh to China (like Nepal).

 

Question

Are we enough in this regard?

 

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here

Subscribe

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

China in south Asia:  Bangladesh tilting towards China by Shafi Mostafa on Southy Asian Voices.

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.

369: FUTURE OF CONFLICT IN THE ASIAN CONTEXT

Pic Courtesy: Wikipedia

 

Asia

 

The largest continent with 30% of land mass (17.21 Million Square miles) and 60% of the world population (4.6 Billion) spread across about 48 countries.

 

The three biggest economies of the continent (China, India, and Japan) are among the top 5 economies of the world.

 

Five Asian countries feature in the list of top 10 militaries of the world (China, India, Japan, Korea, and Turkey), and ten Asian countries feature in the top 20.

 

The continent is generally divided into 5 regions (East, Central, West, south, and southwest).

 

Conflict and War

 

“If you want peace, be prepared for war”

– Julius Caesar

Continue reading “369: FUTURE OF CONFLICT IN THE ASIAN CONTEXT”

368: INTERACTION WITH AN INTERNATIONAL NEWS CHANNEL

 

(It was clarified that the views expressed are my own and have nothing to do with IAF or GOI)

 

The questions addressed and the essence of communicated opinions are as follows:-

 

Q1. What’s your take on the IAF’s modernization plan? Is it going as per schedule?

 

  • Instead of modernisation, I would call it a capability development plan.

 

  • IAF is quite modern.

 

  • Over the years its capabilities have increased manifold (e.g. – capabilities like precision, standoff, airlift, high altitude operations, all-weather 24 X 7 ops, network centricity, etc).

 

  • However, the capacity in terms of quantity (war endurance) needs enhancement.

 

  • The capability and capacity combined determine the deterrence value.

 

  • The deterrence value required depends on threat perception (number of enemies, their capabilities, and their attitude and intentions).

 

  • India faces a collusive threat with aggressive behaviour.

 

  • Capability development and capacity enhancement is a continuous process.

 

  • The process was a bit slow earlier but now has picked up pace.

 

Q2. How do depleting squadron numbers pose a challenge to the IAF?

 

  • Yes, it definitely is a challenge, considering the threats and prevailing environment.

 

  • The drawdown has taken place to about 30 odd squadrons much below the authorised strength.

 

  • The actual numbers needed in order to have the requisite deterrence value would be much higher.

 

  • A drawdown mitigation plan exists and is reviewed periodically.

 

  • Self-reliance is one of the important factors in the plan (also a major lesson learned from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war).

 

  • India is trying the “Leap Frog” method.

 

  • There have been slippages and delays in the past.

 

  • The pace has picked up in the last few years due to the recent initiatives and the multi-pronged approach.

 

  • IAF has always supported self-reliance and would continue to do so.

 

  • However, the minimum deterrence value and a balance between quality and quantity need to be maintained at all times.

 

Q3. The IAF plans to acquire more jets under its ambitious plan to purchase 114 foreign fighter planes – will India go for Sukhois or stick to Rafales?

 

  • First of all, I would replace the word ambitious with needed, urgent, or crucial in the question.

 

  • Keeping in mind what I said earlier about self-reliance, minimum deterrence value, and maintaining of balance between quantity and quality.

 

  • The Indigenous fighter aircraft development plan consists of Tejas MK IA, 4.5 generation Tejas MK II, and 5th generation AMCA.

 

  • The project was slow earlier but has picked up pace now. However, newer versions are some time away and the existing gap needs to be filled up on priority.

 

  • The acquisition of 114 fighter jets is crucial.

 

  • In view of India’s priorities and focus, the deal needs to be “make in India” with a high content of technology transfer.

 

  • As far as which one to buy, would depend on the selection process, which is quite exhaustive and transparent.

 

  • Some of the factors for consideration would be:-
    • Capabilities Vis-à-vis Qualitative requirements.
    • Price – maximum “bang for the buck”.
    • Support to “Make in India”.
    • Transfer of technology.
    • Ability to deliver and sustain.
    • Geo-Political and Geo-Strategic aspects (Including past and present relations).

 

Q4. How the IAF is helping the Indian Army in its current stand-off with China?

 

  • The question needs rephrasing.

 

  • It is a national situation, requiring a whole of nation (all tools of statecraft) approach.

 

  • The defence services are doing the needful jointly and synergistically.

 

  • IAF undertakes missions to accomplish its roles and tasks (like any other defence force), including:-
    • Political and strategic signaling.
    • Rapid mobility, troop induction, and transfer.
    • Sustenance and supply (equipment, ammunition, weapons, rations, etc).
    • Casualty evacuation and medical support.
    • Enhancement of situational awareness by reconnaissance and information sharing.
    • Joint planning and monitoring.
    • Training and equipping to meet challenges.

 

  • All the assets of IAF are always available to deal with prevailing or emerging situations.

 

Q5. How do you view the induction of LCA Tejas in the IAF and Navy, and can the homegrown aircraft become the lynchpin of India’s security apparatus?

 

  • The LCA Navy had been converted into a technology demonstration program.

 

  • The experienced gained would be utilised to develop a TEDBF (Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter).

 

  • IAF has already inducted two squadrons of Tejas aircraft.

 

  • 83 Tejas Mk I aircraft are on order.

 

  • Tejas Mk II and AMCA are under development.

 

  • The teething problems have been addressed and the indigenous fighter aircraft program is evolving and maturing.

 

  • It is essential because of aspects related to cost, self-reliance, the latest technology, availability, integration, and modifications.

 

Q6. In recent years, the Indian Air Force has been focusing on indigenous helicopters and there have been reports that New Delhi’s deal for Russian-built Kamov helicopters has been put on the backburner. What’s your take on this?

 

  • Cannot comment on this issue as I am not privy to IAF or government thinking and decisions.

 

  • My personal views are that given a choice, it is always advantageous to go in for indigenous products due to reasons enumerated earlier.

 

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here

Subscribe

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.

English हिंदी