451: RITU’S COLUMN: Joint IAF & IN Operation at High Sea

Pic Courtesy: Internet

 

Ritu Sharma is a journalist, with a Master’s Degree in Conflict Studies and Management of Peace from the University of Erfurt, Germany. Her areas of interest include Asia-Pacific, the South China Sea, and Aviation history. She has been writing on subjects related to defence, foreign affairs, and nuclear technology for the last 15 years. She has written for PTI, IANS and The New Indian Express. Presently she is writing for the EurAsian Times.  

 

Her article on recent Joint IAF and IN operation at high sea  was published on 18 Jan 2024 on “The EurAsian Times”.

 

(Besides the quotes, the views of the author are her own)

 

No Propaganda-Laced Video! Filipino Expert Mocks China, Says Indian AF-Navy Ops Show ‘Who Is The Boss’

 

By Ritu Sharma -March 18, 2024

 

While the Chinese PLA Navy, despite its increasing size, is still working towards becoming a true blue-water navy capable of operating much beyond its shores, the Indian Navy and the Indian Air Force pooled their resources to paradrop marine commandos from Boeing C-17 Globemaster to rescue a hijacked merchant vessel 1400 nautical miles from the Indian shores.

 

The message was loud and clear that India is the ‘First Responder in the Indian Ocean Region.’

 

It was the first insertion of marine commandos through airdrop on high seas. A rescue right out of Hollywood flick Captain Phillips, the Indian forces executed the anti-piracy operation on the high seas that unfolded for over 40 hours.

 

Indian Navy’s stealth-guided missile destroyer INS Kolkata intercepted a merchant vessel, MV Ruen, which was hijacked by Somali pirates on December 13, 2023. The pirates had sailed in the ship to conduct more acts of piracy when they were stopped by the INS Kolkata.

 

The emboldened pirates opened fire at INS Kolkata and, in the reckless hostile act, shot down a drone launched from the destroyer. This set in motion a high-voltage anti-piracy mission that underscored that the Indian Navy is not to be trifled with.

 

INS Subhadra patrol vessel, maritime patrol aircraft P-8I, and a high-altitude long-endurance drone joined the mission, while an IAF’s C-17 took off from India with the elite marine commandos (Marcos) of the Indian Navy. It flew for 10 hours and carried out a precision airborne drop of two Combat Rubberised Raiding Craft boats along with the Indian Navy Marcos trained in paradrop.

 

The paradrop is difficult in the best of circumstances. However, it becomes extremely challenging on high seas because sea and air conditions impact accuracy. The hazard of parachuting into water is always present.

 

The Indian marine commandos undergo regular training for para jumps with the Air Force; however, this is the first time they have been para-dropped so far away from the Indian coast.

 

The Marine Commandos boarded the bulk carrier MV Ruen and successfully disarmed the 35 pirates on the ship to successfully rescue 17 crew members on board.

 

The operation, in addition to underscoring the Indian Navy’s capability to defend maritime laws in its area of dominance from the Gulf of Aden in the West to the Malacca Straits in the East, also highlighted the growing cohesiveness of the Indian Armed Forces to carry out joint operations with finesse.

 

“IAF works closely not only with surface forces (Army and Navy) but also other agencies like NDMA (National Disaster Management Agency) and NSG (National Security Guards) etc, for induction and insertion of troops and special forces. Depending on the type of load (men and material), distance from the launch base, and method of induction/insertion (landed, para drop, or slithering), the appropriate aircraft is decided. A detailed planning has to be done for such operations,” former IAF Vice Chief Air Marshal Anil Khosla (retired) elaborated to the EurAsian Times.

 

“Prevailing ground environment is a very important factor. The airspace around the drop zone or landing area needs to be sanitized to rule out any anti-aircraft threat. These types of joint operations have been done in the past and will be carried out in the future as and when needed,” Air Marshal Khosla added.

 

The Indian Navy’s anti-piracy operations have earned accolades from across the globe. Although it has yet to confront Houthi rebels, it has been one of the first responders to multiple merchant vessels that have been impacted.

 

The incident has been widely covered in regional countries. A maritime security expert from the Philippines, Collin Koh, said obliquely, referring to China: “A net security provider shows its mettle with air force-navy integration in a real-life security contingency. It beats somebody else who only loves to publish flashy, propaganda-laced videos.”

 

Comparison To The Green-Water PLA Navy

 

When the Indian Navy is compared to the PLA Navy, the number of warships in the Chinese Armada is discussed. However, the Indian Navy’s blue water capabilities are only reflected in the Chinese Navy’s blue water ambitions.

 

Despite having the world’s biggest naval fleet, over 340 warships, the PLA Navy has been regarded as a green-water navy, operating mostly near the country’s shores. However, by augmenting its ship-building capability, it is expected to bloom into a true-blue-water navy by 2050.

 

China’s “Defence White Paper 2019” mentioned that the PLA is speeding up its transition to “Far-Seas Protection” as its maritime interests are growing. Hence, securing strategic sea lines of communication is becoming imperative for Chinese interests.

 

This has also seen the PLA-Navy increasing its footprints westwards. China is aware of the Indian Navy’s prowess and the advantage that India’s geographical location provides it. This is why China has not provoked India at sea, as it lacks the capability.

 

However, China is increasing its reach by building an overseas base. Besides Djibouti and Ream naval base in Cambodia, it is actively scouting for potential locations for military outposts. China’s foothold in Maldives, in the Indian backyard, is therefore concerning for New Delhi.

 

India has sought to counter this loss by building a naval air base in the Lakshadweep Islands group. The Indian Isles, located in the Arabian Sea, is just 507 kilometers from the Maldives and is seen as an alternative to the Maldives. The ramping up of facilities on the island will mean that soon, the Indian frontline fighter jets will roar in the Western part of the Indian Ocean.

 

India has already set on the path of developing the military assets on the archipelago of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which sits on the mouth of the Strait of Malacca, a gateway to the South China Sea and a significant choke point for the Chinese Navy.

 

The northernmost point of the 572 islands is only 22 nautical miles away from Myanmar, and its southernmost point is a mere 90 nautical miles from Indonesia. The islands control the Bay of Bengal, the Six Degree, and the Ten Degree channels, which over 60,000 commercial vessels use.

 

While mid-air refueling has increased the Indian forces’ reach, the need for more supporting bases cannot be negated. “Earlier ferries to faraway places used to take many days with lots of halts en route. Now, aircraft reach much faster with mid-air refueling. But for sustained operations away from the mainland, supporting bases would be required,” Air Marshal Khosla added.

 

In 2018, India also gained access to the strategically located port of Duqm on Oman’s southern coast. Sitting on the northwestern edge of the Indian Ocean, Duqm provides the Indian Navy easy access into the Red Sea through the Gulf of Aden, helping the Indian Navy sustain long-term operations in the Western Indian Ocean.

 

Link to the article:-

No Propaganda-Laced Video! Filipino Expert Mocks China, Says Indian AF-Navy Ops Show ‘Who Is The Boss’

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

The EurAsian Times: https://www.eurasiantimes.com/no-propaganda-video-pilipino-expert-mocks-china/

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.

449: New Horizons Indo-US Collaboration: Aerospace & Defence Technology

 

 

Indus International Research Foundation (IIRF) conducted a Seminar in collaboration with World Trade Centre Utah, USA.

 

The theme was “Indo-US Collaboration in Trade, Technologies, Aerospace and Defence”.

 

 

Spoke on the subject of Collaboration in Aerospace and Defence Technologies.

 

Touched upon the following:-

 

    • Recent Trends in Indo-US defence cooperation.

 

    • World  in Transition & Repercussions.

 

    • Relevance of Collective Security.

 

    • Changes in Warfare.

 

    • Reverse Globalisation.

 

    • Indian Compulsions.

 

    • Indian Approach.

 

    • Approach to Collaboration.

 

    • Trust Issues.

 

    • Look at India as collaborative partner, rather than Just a defence market.

 

    • Need to Empower India.

 

    • Government efforts to encourage self reliance and ease of doing business.

 

    • Make in India and Make for the world.

 

    • Collaboration areas.

 

    • Technologies for possible collaboration.

 

    • Collaboration areas in air & aerospace domain.

 

    • The way ahead.

 

Please click on the link below (Viewing time 10 Min):

 

 

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.

 

 

446: ORCHESTRATING AIR CAMPAIGN: THUMB RULES

 

Pic : Courtesy Internet

 

War is the most complex of human endeavours. It is baffling and intriguing. It is complex, demanding, and requires careful thought and cool execution.

 

The compelling task of the commander is to translate national war objectives into tactical plans at the operational level.

 

Four levels of war:-

    • Grand Strategic level.
    • Strategic level.
    • Operational level.
    • Tactical Level.

(As you go up the ladder, the ambiguity increases).

 

Mastery of the operational level strategy is a key to winning wars.

 

An air force inferior in numbers must fight better and smarter.

 

It is an art to identify the enemy’s Centre of Gravity (COG – a point where the enemy is vulnerable and where the application of force is most decisive).

 

Offensive Approach.

    • The initiative is retained.
    • Pressure is on the enemy.
    • War is taken to enemy territory.
    • All assets are used.
    • Yields positive results if successful.

 

Defensive Approach.

    • The initiative is with the enemy.
    • Some assets may lie idle.
    • At best yields neutral results.

 

Adopted approach

 

The approach to be adopted depends upon factors like political will, objectives, doctrinal guidance, own vis-à-vis enemy capability, and the force disparity (numerical and qualitative superiority are major factors).

 

Anticipate and predict enemy reactions and plans. Study the enemy psyche and categorise it (rational, irrational, fanatic, rigid, flexible, independent, innovative, determined etc.).

 

Enemy SWOT analysis and intelligence analysis are important to decide on the approach (Consider factors like Aircraft numbers and quality, weapons, training, network, combat support platforms, sensors, ability to absorb losses, vulnerabilities etc.).

 

A periodic review is required to decide on the continuation of the approach.

 

If enemy AD is strong – avoid it till you can punch holes in it and create blind zones.

 

If air combat capability is better than draw the enemy out.

 

Keep in mind

 

    • Air assets are always scarce – It is not possible to defend everything.

 

    • Scarce air resources are optimally utilised when shared and not kept idle on the ground – under command tendency should be avoided.

 

    • Scarce air resources cannot be everywhere and cannot precede every surface operation.

 

    • Operational commanders should stay away from tactical decisions – have faith in executors and concentrate on operational orchestration.

 

    • Air operations are conducted over a greater expanse of space and time as compared to surface operations.

 

    • Air power should not be seen as subordinate (supporting arm) to surface operations. The air element of surface forces should be used according to the tenets of the surface operations. Unambiguous and thorough doctrinal understating is essential.

 

    • It is difficult to predict the duration and intensity of war. The intensity of war generally depends on the value and interest of the side in what they are fighting for.

 

Planning considerations

 

    • Audacity does not lead to positive results every time – avoid the tendency to plunge into any and every fray.

 

    • The loss ratio is a function of the force ratio.

 

    • Concentration of forces, mass, numbers, weight of attack and force structure are important for inflicting prohibitive damage to the enemy.

 

    • Bad weather can be a spoilsport – choose the campaign/operational window carefully (it is also true for the enemy).

 

    • Fog of war, uncertainty in war and friction of war are realities to be dealt with.

 

    • An asset not used is an asset wasted – a sortie not flown is a sortie wasted. At the same time, a sortie saved is worth more than a sortie rashly flown.

 

    • War effort comes in surges and spurts. Accordingly, the approach could be to continuously engage in a war of attrition or to hit unexpectedly and wait.

 

    • Airpower can carry out parallel operations (campaigns). It is essential to decide the percentage of effort allotted to each campaign and to dynamically review it periodically depending upon the changing situation.

 

    • Deception (mystify and mislead) is very important to achieve surprise.

 

Air Superiority

 

It is a necessity. Air or Ground campaigns cannot succeed unless a certain degree of air superiority is achieved.

 

Air superiority by itself doesn’t guarantee victory.

 

Destroying the enemy aircraft is not the only way of achieving it.

 

Destroying enemy aircraft in the air is the most difficult and costly approach (it is easier to destroy them on the ground).

 

It can also be achieved by attacking the enemy bases – heavyweight of attack and revisits are required.

 

It can be achieved by targeting resources like fuel, and human resources (crew and pilots).

 

It can also be achieved by attacking production houses and supply chains.

 

Enemy command and control centres are also possible targets towards this aim.

 

Interdiction / Battlefield Strikes

 

Interdiction is as old and important as war itself – Airpower has added a new dimension to it.

 

It is a powerful, important and effective tool in the hands of commanders and planners.

 

Airpower should not be seen as airborne artillery – Airpower should generally be used for targets beyond the range of ground weapons (artillery).

 

Art is to decide what to and where to interdict between the source and the destination.

 

    • Distant Interdiction – most decisive but effective with a time lag,
    • Intermediate Interdiction – effective with a lesser time lag.
    • Close Interdiction – effective immediately and necessary during crises.

 

Choice of the platform depends on the degree of air control and enemy air defence capability and weapons – the vulnerability of fixed-wing combat support aircraft, helicopters and unmanned platforms (Drones) is high in contested airspace.

 

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

The Air Campaign: Planning for Combat by John A Warden III, 1988, National Defense University Press, Washington DC.

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.

 

English हिंदी