591: TRANSFORMING INDIA’S SKIES: THE MRFA ACQUISITION FOR A FUTURE-READY IAF

Pic Courtesy Net

 

My Article Published in the Life of Soldier e-Magazine Feb 25.

 

The geopolitical landscape in South Asia and the Indo-Pacific region is undergoing a significant transformation in the emerging world order. In this context, India’s need for a technologically advanced and combat-ready air force is more crucial than ever. The impending Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) acquisition program, a strategic necessity, marks a critical juncture in India’s quest to modernise its air power. This program, which aims to procure 114 state-of-the-art fighter jets under the ‘Buy Global, Make in India’ initiative, is a pivotal step in addressing the IAF’s operational challenges, including an ageing fleet, numerical shortfalls, and the growing assertiveness of adversarial air forces. By integrating next-generation platforms equipped with cutting-edge avionics, superior weapons systems, and enhanced survivability features, the IAF is poised to significantly bolster its strategic deterrence capabilities and maintain air superiority in the region.

 

The MRFA acquisition is not a mere procurement exercise; it is a comprehensive effort to revamp India’s aerospace ecosystem. This initiative, which fosters technological self-reliance and bolsters the defence industrial base, is a testament to India’s commitment to its defence capabilities. With contenders such as the Dassault Rafale, Boeing F-15EX, Lockheed Martin F-21, Eurofighter Typhoon, and the Russian Sukhoi Su-35, the competition promises to be intense, offering India a wide array of options that blend operational effectiveness with long-term economic and strategic benefits. The program’s emphasis on indigenous production through partnerships with Indian defence firms is expected to stimulate job creation, enhance research and development capabilities, and position India as a global hub for aerospace manufacturing.

 

However, the MRFA acquisition is not without its challenges. Budgetary constraints, bureaucratic delays, and the intricate process of technology transfer and industrial collaboration pose significant hurdles. Moreover, the rapidly evolving nature of aerial warfare, characterised by the increasing role of unmanned systems, artificial intelligence, and cyber warfare, necessitates a forward-looking approach to ensure that the selected platform remains relevant over the next several decades. The decision-making process must also consider the IAF’s evolving doctrinal requirements, interoperability with existing assets such as the indigenous Tejas fighter and the recently acquired Rafale jets, and the long-term sustainability of the fleet.

 

As India navigates the complexities of the MRFA program, it is a testament to the nation’s commitment to safeguarding its airspace. The successful execution of this program will not only enhance India’s operational preparedness but also strengthen its position as a credible regional power capable of countering emerging threats and contributing to collective security frameworks. With strategic foresight and meticulous planning, the MRFA acquisition has the potential to not just bolster but redefine India’s aerial combat capabilities, ensuring that the IAF remains a formidable force in the 21st century.

 

Historical Perspective. The history of India’s MRFA acquisition effort is marked by ambitious plans and evolving defence strategies to modernise the IAF’s fighter fleet. The origins of the MRFA initiative can be traced back to the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender issued in 2007, which sought to acquire 126 fighter jets to replace the ageing MiG-21 fleet. The competition saw participation from major global defence manufacturers, including Dassault, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Saab, and Eurofighter. After extensive evaluations and trials, the Dassault Rafale emerged as the preferred choice in 2012; however, contractual disagreements and cost escalations led to the eventual scrapping of the deal in 2015. In its place, the Indian government opted for a government-to-government deal to procure 36 Rafale jets in 2016 to meet urgent operational needs. The failure of the MMRCA tender to materialise in its original form highlighted the complexities involved in large-scale defence procurements, including cost considerations, technology transfer requirements, and offset agreements. In response to these challenges, the IAF redefined its requirements and reinitiated the procurement process under the MRFA program in 2019. The renewed effort sought to leverage lessons learned from the previous tender while emphasising indigenisation and the development of India’s defence manufacturing capabilities under the ‘Make in India’ initiative. Unlike its predecessor, the MRFA acquisition focuses more on domestic production, requiring foreign vendors to collaborate with Indian defence firms to establish local assembly lines and facilitate technology transfers.

 

Overview of the MRFA Acquisition Program. The MRFA acquisition program is a critical initiative by the Indian Air Force to acquire 114 advanced multi-role fighter jets to enhance its operational capabilities and replace its ageing fleet of legacy aircraft. The program seeks to address the dwindling squadron strength of the IAF, which has declined from the sanctioned 42 squadrons to around 31, posing a strategic challenge in the face of potential two-front threats from China and Pakistan. Under MRFA, the IAF aims to procure state-of-the-art fighters that can undertake various combat roles, including air superiority, ground attack, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare, ensuring dominance in modern warfare scenarios. The MRFA acquisition process is structured under the ‘Make in India’ initiative, emphasising indigenous production and technology transfer to boost the domestic defence industry. The IAF issued a global Request for Information (RFI) in 2019, inviting proposals from major aircraft manufacturers worldwide. The procurement is expected to be executed under the Strategic Partnership (SP) model, which involves collaboration between foreign Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Indian defence firms. This collaboration will not only establish production lines within the country but also transfer critical technologies, thereby reducing dependency on imports and promoting self-reliance in the defence sector.  One of the critical requirements outlined by the IAF in the MRFA tender is the transfer of technology (ToT), which will allow Indian defence companies to gain technical expertise in aircraft manufacturing, maintenance, and future upgrades. The aircraft must be capable of conducting missions in diverse operational environments, from high-altitude regions like the Himalayas to maritime operations over the Indian Ocean. The MRFA jets must possess advanced radar systems (AESA), electronic warfare capabilities, precision-guided munitions, and compatibility with Indian and Western weapons. Additionally, the IAF would be keen on ensuring interoperability with existing platforms such as the indigenous Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) and the recently inducted Rafale fighters.

 

Advantages and Necessity. The integration of Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) into the Indian Air Force (IAF) is expected to bridge several operational gaps while complementing the existing fighter fleet, which includes the Su-30MKI, Rafale, and Tejas.

 

    • The IAF’s sanctioned strength is 42 fighter squadrons, but the current strength hovers around 31 squadrons. The MRFA will fill this shortfall, ensuring better preparedness against a two-front threat scenario involving China and Pakistan.
    • MRFA will bring advanced multirole capabilities, allowing the fleet to handle air superiority, ground attack, and maritime roles seamlessly. This versatility fills gaps in specific mission profiles, especially when assets are stretched thin.
    • The Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) will be a critical asset for the Indian Air Force (IAF) in multi-domain operations (MDO), enhancing network-centric warfare capabilities. Its advanced systems, flexible mission profiles, and integration capabilities will enable the IAF to operate effectively across air, land, sea, space, and cyber domains.
    • The MRFA will provide the IAF with cutting-edge technologies and weaponry to dominate contested environments. By combining advanced sensors, stealth, weapon systems, and network-centric capabilities, the MRFA ensures a decisive edge over adversaries.
    • The MRFA program is more than a defence procurement initiative. It is a catalyst for India’s self-reliance in aerospace and defence. By emphasising technology transfer, local production, and industrial collaboration, the program will strengthen the IAF and lay the foundation for a robust and competitive domestic aerospace sector, aligning seamlessly with India’s vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India).

 

Timelines.  The acquisition process encompasses several critical phases. In April 2019, the IAF issued an RFI to global aerospace manufacturers, marking the formal commencement of the MRFA program. This step invited potential vendors to submit details about their aircraft offerings suitable for India’s defence requirements. The next step in the process is the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) and Request for Proposal (RFP). Following AoN, the IAF hopes to issue the RFP by mid-2025, detailing specific requirements and inviting formal bids from shortlisted manufacturers. Upon receiving responses to the RFP, the IAF will conduct comprehensive evaluations, including technical assessments and field trials, to ascertain the suitability of each aircraft. This meticulous process is expected to span approximately two years. Post-evaluation, the IAF will negotiate with the selected vendor to finalise terms encompassing pricing, technology transfer, and local production under the ‘Make in India’ initiative. Given the complexity of such defence procurements, this phase is anticipated to take around two years. Following contract finalisation, the establishment of production facilities and commencement of manufacturing are projected. The induction could start as early as 2030, based on fast-tracking. This timeline underscores the intricate and prolonged nature of large-scale defence acquisitions.

 

Interested Contenders. The MRFA program has attracted interest from multiple global aerospace manufacturers, with contenders including Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, Boeing F-15EX Eagle II, Dassault  Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Lockheed Martin F-21 (a variant of the F-16V tailored for Indian requirements), Mikoyan MiG-35, Sukhoi Su-35 (Russia), and Saab JAS-39 Gripen E/F. Each aircraft offers advanced features such as cutting-edge avionics, stealth capabilities, and superior weapon systems, which are crucial for India’s evolving defence needs.

 

Challenges. The Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) acquisition program of the Indian Air Force (IAF) faces several significant challenges that could impact its timely execution and successful implementation. One of the foremost challenges is the complexity of the procurement process, which involves multiple stages such as issuing the Request for Proposal (RFP), conducting extensive evaluations and trials, negotiating contracts, and ensuring technology transfer under the ‘Make in India’ initiative. These steps are time-consuming and often subject to bureaucratic delays, which could push the timeline further. Another critical challenge is budgetary constraints, as the estimated cost of the MRFA program exceeds $20 billion. Allocating such a substantial budget amidst competing defence priorities, such as developing Indigenous fighter programs like the Tejas Mk2 and the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), poses financial challenges. Additionally, fluctuations in the global economy and currency exchange rates could further complicate financial planning. Technology transfer and local production requirements also present challenges, as ensuring meaningful knowledge sharing and developing a robust domestic defence ecosystem will require significant investments in infrastructure and skilled workforce development. Partnering foreign Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) may be reluctant to share critical proprietary technologies, potentially limiting India’s self-reliance goals. Furthermore, geopolitical factors play a crucial role in the procurement. India’s defence acquisitions must often align with its strategic partnerships and foreign policy objectives. Selecting an aircraft from Western or Russian manufacturers could have diplomatic ramifications, affecting relations with other key defence partners. Lastly, operational challenges such as integrating new fighter platforms with existing IAF assets, logistics support, and pilot training add further complexity. Ensuring compatibility with existing weapon systems and communication networks is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency. Overcoming these challenges will be vital to the success of the MRFA program.

 

Urgency and Review. Despite the government’s support, the MRFA program has encountered delays, partly due to the complexities of the procurement process and the imperative to align with indigenous production goals. In the meantime, the adversaries have inducted fifth-generation aircraft in large numbers and have already flown sixth-generation prototypes. Given emerging threats, investing in 4.5-generation technology may not suffice, advocating for a shift towards fifth-generation fighter capabilities. The indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project is underway but faces delays, with production not expected until the mid-2030s. In the interim, options such as accelerating the AMCA’s development or exploring international collaborations for next-generation fighter technology must be pursued with vigour.

 

Conclusion. The MRFA is a critical investment for the IAF to overcome existing operational gaps and maximise the potential of its current fighter platforms. Enabling seamless integration and interoperability would ensure a balanced, versatile, and future-ready air force capable of effectively addressing current and future threats. The MRFA program’s success lies in balancing operational needs with financial prudence. The MRFA fleet can remain sustainable and aligned with the IAF’s operational tempo by emphasising lifecycle cost management, indigenous production, and efficient logistics. This would ensure a modern, capable, and resilient air force capable of effectively addressing present and future challenges.

 

Please do Comment.

 

1997
Default rating

Please give a thumbs up if you  like The Post?

 

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

References:-

  1. Rajagopalan, Rajeswari P. “India’s Fighter Jet Procurement Challenges.” Strategic Analysis Journal, vol. 44, no. 2, 2021, pp. 156-170.
  1. Bedi, Rahul. “The MRFA Program: Delays and Strategic Necessity.” Jane’s Defence Weekly, 2023.
  1. Kumar, Anil. “Self-Reliance in Defence Manufacturing: Evaluating the MRFA Approach.” IDSA Journal of Defence Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, 2022, pp. 47-62.
  1. Sharma, Vivek. “Combat Readiness of the IAF: The Role of MRFA.” Air Power Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, 2021, pp. 23-40.
  1. Joshi, Manoj. India’s Military Modernisation: Challenges and Prospects. Observer Research Foundation (ORF), 2020.
  1. Indian Air Force. Vision 2030: Modernisation Strategy and Roadmap. IAF Publications, 2021.
  1. Singh, Harsh V. Air Power in India: Strategic Imperatives and Force Modernisation. Pentagon Press, 2019.
  1. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). Modernising India’s Air Power: The Next Two Decades. Routledge, 2018.
  1. Pandit, Rajat. “IAF to Seek RFP for 114 Fighter Jets Under MRFA Project.” The Times of India, 2023.
  1. Peri, Dinakar. “MRFA: The IAF’s Long-Pending Fighter Jet Acquisition.” The Hindu, 2023.
  1. “MRFA Program: India’s Search for a Multi-Role Fighter.” Economic Times Defence, 2024.
  1. “114 Fighter Jet Deal: Status Update and Challenges.” India Defence Review, 2023.
  1. “Make-in-India Push: MRFA Fighter Jet Procurement Plans Explained.” Business Standard, 2023. (https://business-standard.com)
  1. Centre for Air Power Studies (CAPS). Next-Gen Combat Aircraft for the IAF: MRFA and Beyond. CAPS, 2021.

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

590: Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft War over Indian Skies.

 

Pic Courtesy Net

 

Fifth Generation War over Indian Skies.

 

Comprehensive coverage of the subject on India Today’s Battle Cry.

 

Click on the link below:-

 

Please do Comment.

 

1997
Default rating

Please give a thumbs up if you  like The Post?

 

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

 

587:CHINESE FIGHTER AIRCRAFT FOR BANGLADESH: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

 

Pic Courtesy Net

 

Bangladesh has shown a growing interest in modernising its air force as part of its broader military modernisation under the “Forces Goal 2030” initiative. The BAF currently operates older platforms. These ageing aircraft are increasingly inadequate against modern threats and require replacement with advanced platforms. The BAF has recently considered acquiring new-generation multirole fighter jets, including Chinese aircraft.

 

Interest in J-10C. The Chinese J-10C, a fourth-generation-plus multi-role fighter jet boasting advanced avionics, weapon systems, and cost efficiency, had featured on Bangladesh’s wish list. This news about the possible acquisition of J-10C aircraft followed Air Chief Marshal Hasan Mahmood Khan’s visit to China in Nov 2024. He reportedly expressed Bangladesh’s desire to acquire about 16 J-10C multi-role combat aircraft from China.

 

Interest in JF-17. A high-level defence delegation from Bangladesh showed interest in JF-17 Thunders during a visit to Pakistan in January 2025. The delegation, led by Lieutenant General SM Qamarul Hassan, Principal Staff Officer, Armed Forces Division, Bangladesh, met with Pakistan Air Force (PAF) Chief Air Chief Marshal Zaheer Ahmad Babar Sidhu at the Air Headquarters in Islamabad. According to the report, Lieutenant General Hassan explicitly expressed interest in the JF-17 Thunder aircraft, sparking rumours about a possible purchase. This was the first time Bangladesh had expressed its interest in the JF-17. Earlier reports suggested that Bangladesh heavily favoured the Chinese J-10C 4.5th-generation aircraft.

 

The J-10C Aircraft. The J-10C, known as the ‘Vigorous Dragon’, is claimed to be a fourth-generation multirole combat aircraft equipped with the Chinese-manufactured WS-10B engine. China’s Chengdu Aircraft Corporation has developed it. J-10C represents an evolutionary version of the J-10 series.  The J-10C was first unveiled to the Chinese public in July 2017 and has been operational since 2018. It features significant advancements over earlier variants. It is capable of both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions and is well-suited for diverse operational scenarios. With a delta wing-canard configuration and an optional thrust-vectoring engine, the J-10C claims excellent manoeuvrability and agility in combat. The J-10C is equipped with an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which offers enhanced detection, tracking, and targeting capabilities in all weather conditions. Advanced avionics and integrated electronic warfare systems for jamming enemy radar and countering electronic threats enhance survivability. The jet can carry various armaments, including the PL-15 beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile (BVR-AAM), which has a range of over 200 km.

 

JF-17 aircraft. The JF-17 Thunder is a single-engine, lightweight, multi-role combat aircraft. With a maximum speed of approximately 1,200 mph and a service ceiling of 50,000 feet, the JF-17 can carry out various tasks. It is designed to carry Chinese weaponry on its seven hardpoints, including the LS-6 GPS-guided glide bombs, the PL-5 short-range air-to-air missile, and the YJ-12 supersonic and YJ-83 subsonic anti-shipping missiles. Although not directly integrated, the JF-17 can also be equipped with external pods that carry self-defence jammers and electro-optical/infrared sensors. Since its induction in the PAF in 2007, the JF-17 has been upgraded several times. If Bangladesh decides to go for the JF-17, it will likely purchase the Block III variant with superior manoeuvrability, extended range, and enhanced combat capabilities.

 

Comparative Analysis: JF-17 Thunder vs. J-10C

 

The JF-17 Thunder and the J-10C are modern fighter jets developed by China. The former was a collaborative effort between China and Pakistan. They are designed for different roles, customers, and operational needs.

 

Development Background. The JF-17 Thunder was developed jointly by China’s Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) and Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC). It is designed as a cost-effective, lightweight, multirole fighter for export markets and Pakistan’s Air Force (PAF).  The aircraft is projected for its affordability and ease of maintenance. On the other hand, the J-10C was developed solely by the CAC for the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). It is a more advanced, multirole, fourth-generation-plus fighter designed for high-end performance and greater sophistication.

 

Roles and Missions. The JF-17 Thunder is a lightweight multirole fighter suited for air defence, close air support, and precision strike roles. It targets countries with limited defence budgets. In comparison, the J-10C is designed as a medium-weight multirole fighter capable of air superiority, ground attack, and advanced electronic warfare. It operates in high-threat environments against sophisticated adversaries.

 

Airframe and Design. The JF-17 Thunder is lightweight (approximately 12.7 tons max take-off weight), with a conventional layout and a focus on simplicity and agility. It uses composite materials to reduce weight and cost. Being small and lighter, it is easier to deploy from forward airbases. In contrast, the J-10C is medium-weight (approximately 19 tons max take-off weight), with a canard-delta wing configuration for superior manoeuvrability and aerodynamics—higher use of advanced composites for reduced radar cross-section. The larger size offers a better payload and range.

 

Avionics and Sensors. The newer JF-17 Thunder variant has the KLJ-7 or NRIET KLJ-7A active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar. It has a decent avionics suite, including a glass cockpit and helmet-mounted display (HMD). On the other hand, the J-10C has an advanced AESA radar with superior range and tracking capability, highly advanced fully digital flight systems and integrated HMD, and a robust EW suite capable of countering high-end threats.

 

Engines and Performance. The Russian RD-93 or Chinese WS-13 engine powers the JF-17 Thunder. The engine has an 85 kN thrust, enabling the aircraft to attain a speed of Mach 1.6, a combat radius of 1,352 km, and a service ceiling of 55,000 feet. Comparatively, the J-10C initially had an AL-31FN (Russian) engine. The newer variants use China’s WS-10B Taihang engine with a 132 kN thrust. The aircraft can attain a speed of Mach 2.2, has a combat radius of 1,700 km, and a service ceiling of 59,055 feet.

 

Weapons Systems. The JF-17 Thunder can carry PL-5, PL-9, PL-10, or PL-15 beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles, precision-guided munitions like laser-guided bombs and cruise missiles (Ra’ad), and CM-400AKG Anti-ship missile. Its total payload is 3,600 kg. The J-10C has a total payload of 6,000 kg, including advanced PL-10 (IR-guided) and PL-15 (BVR) Air to air missiles with longer ranges, precision-strike capability with advanced guided munitions, and advanced anti-ship missiles for maritime strike roles.

 

Stealth and Survivability. The JF-17 Thunder has limited stealth features and focuses on reduced radar cross-section (RCS) using composites. By contrast, the J-10C possesses a semi-stealth design with reduced RCS due to airframe shaping and the use of RAM (Radar-Absorbing Material). It is more survivable in contested environments.

 

Cost. The JF-17 Thunder reportedly costs approximately $30-40 million per unit (depending on the variant), whereas the J-10C costs roughly $60-70 million per unit.

 

The JF-17 Thunder is projected as an affordable and versatile fighter, ideal for nations needing a cheaper and reliable multirole platform. In contrast, the J-10C is a more capable and sophisticated aircraft, suitable for nations looking for high-end performance and advanced technology.

 

Key Dynamics

Bangladesh is considering acquiring the Chinese JF-17 Thunder and possibly the J-10C for its next-generation fighter program. While the JF-17 Thunder offers a cost-effective, multirole platform with decent air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities, the J-10C aircraft, with its advanced capabilities, including AESA radar, stealth features, and modern weaponry, aligns with Bangladesh’s ambitions to bolster regional deterrence. However, the final decision will depend upon numerous factors, such as balancing operational requirements, geopolitical considerations, and financial viability.

 

Strategic Ties with China. Bangladesh maintains strong defence and economic ties with China, its largest military hardware supplier. Bangladesh is China’s second-largest arms buyer after Pakistan. China has previously supplied naval ships, tanks, and other defence systems to Bangladesh, making Chinese aircraft a logical choice for continuity.

 

Dependence on China. A heavy reliance on Chinese defence equipment could limit Bangladesh’s strategic autonomy and expose it to geopolitical pressure from Beijing.

 

Affordability and Financing. Chinese fighter jets are significantly cheaper than Western counterparts like the Eurofighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale, or Lockheed Martin F-16. China offers flexible financing options, which would appeal to Bangladesh.

 

Operational Costs. While the upfront costs are low, operational and maintenance costs can accumulate over time, especially if Bangladesh opts for higher-end platforms like the J-10C. Financing through Chinese loans might deepen Bangladesh’s economic reliance on Beijing, potentially leading to broader strategic vulnerabilities.

 

Challenges and Concerns. Although Chinese aircraft like the JF-17 and J-10C are advanced, they may lag behind Western jets in reliability, engine performance, and software integration. Critics argue that the aircraft relies heavily on older technologies and reverse-engineered components.

 

Geopolitics. Geopolitical tension in the Indo-Pacific is rising, with China and the United States wanting Bangladesh in their camp. Bangladesh’s shift towards China could strain its relationship with the United States.

 

Balancing Foreign Policy. The U.S. and Western nations might view Bangladesh’s deepening defence ties with China as a shift away from a balanced foreign policy. This alignment might affect Bangladesh’s ability to balance relationships with other major powers. It could also impact Bangladesh’s access to Western defence technology and economic support.

 

Indian Concern. Bangladesh’s acquisition of Chinese jets would deepen its defence ties with Beijing, aligning with China’s broader strategy of counterbalancing India’s regional influence. This could shift the balance of power in South Asia. Acquiring Chinese jets and aligning with China would complicate Dhaka’s relationship with New Delhi.

 

Conclusion

 

Likely Scenario. Bangladesh’s need to rapidly upgrade its air force, budget constraints, strategic ties with China, and other geopolitical considerations make a deal to procure the JF-17 Thunder Block III comparatively more likely.

 

Bangladesh’s potential acquisition of Chinese fighter jets represents both an opportunity and a risk. On one hand, they would enhance the Bangladesh Air Force’s capabilities, improving its deterrence and operational flexibility. On the other hand, the move comes with substantial financial, operational, and geopolitical challenges that could outweigh the benefits if not carefully managed. The decision also carries significant implications for Bangladesh’s strategic autonomy. Bangladesh must carefully weigh its strategic, operational, and economic priorities to make an informed decision that enhances its national security while maintaining a balanced foreign policy approach.

 

Please do Comment.

 

1997
Default rating

Please give a thumbs up if you  like The Post?

 

Link to the Article on the website:-

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/j-10c-vs-jf-17-two-chinese-fighter-jets-battle/

 

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

References:-

  1. Farhana, S. “Bangladesh’s Defence Modernisation: The Role of Chinese Military Hardware.” Journal of South Asian Defence Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, 2023, pp. 97-116.
  1. Sayed Ahmed, “The Role of Chinese Fighter Jets in Bangladesh’s Air Force Modernisation”, Bangladesh Defence Journal, 2022.
  1. Muhammad Tariq, “Assessing the Performance of the JF-17 Thunder in the South Asian Context”, Defence Studies Quarterly, 2020.
  1. Chowdhury, A. “J-10C Jets for Bangladesh: Boosting Capabilities or a Risky Gamble?” Strategic Studies Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2, 2024, pp. 72-89.
  1. Beijing Insight. “Bangladesh’s Potential Purchase of Chinese J-10C Jets: Analysing Strategic Choices.” The Diplomat, 15 December 2023.
  1. “The Strategic Consequences of Bangladesh Acquiring Chinese Fighter Jets.” South Asian Voices, 10 December 2023.
  1. Tanvir A. Siddique, “Bangladesh’s Balancing Act: Military Procurement from China and the West”, Asian Security Review, 2023.
  1. Shahab Enam Khan, “Bangladesh Defence Policy and Strategic Outlook”, BIISS, 2019.

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

English हिंदी