Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
Global citizenship has become crucial to education and digital engagement in an increasingly interconnected world. Global citizenship in education extends beyond national boundaries, emphasising cross-cultural understanding, ethical responsibility, and sustainable development. Schools and universities worldwide are integrating global perspectives into curricula, encouraging students to develop intercultural competence, critical thinking, and a sense of global responsibility.
Simultaneously, digital technology has revolutionised how individuals engage with the world, empowering them with unprecedented access to information, communication, and collaboration. The rise of social media, online learning platforms, and digital activism has given individuals the power to participate in global conversations, advocate for social justice, and address pressing global challenges. However, integrating global citizenship into digital spaces raises concerns about misinformation, digital divides, and ethical dilemmas.
As education systems adapt to the digital age, the role of educators in fostering responsible and informed global citizens has become more critical. This article explores the intersection of global citizenship, education, and digital engagement, examining how technological advancements can support inclusive, ethical, and globally aware learning experiences.
Defining Global Citizenship. Global citizenship recognises that individuals are part of an interconnected world, with rights and responsibilities beyond national borders. It emphasises a shared humanity, fostering awareness, empathy, and action toward global challenges such as climate change, social justice, and inequality. A global citizen values cultural diversity, engages in critical thinking, and works to create a more just and sustainable world. In education, global citizenship promotes interdisciplinary learning, ethical reasoning, and digital literacy, empowering individuals to navigate complex global issues responsibly. It is not just about knowledge but also about fostering a mindset of cooperation and collective responsibility.
Global Citizenship in Education
Incorporating Global Perspectives in Curricula. Education shapes global citizens by integrating international issues into school curricula. Topics such as climate change, human rights, and sustainable development are increasingly included in history, science, and social studies. Programs like the International Baccalaureate (IB) and UNESCO’s Global Citizenship Education (GCED) emphasise critical thinking, cross-cultural understanding, and ethical responsibility. By learning about global challenges and solutions, students develop the knowledge and skills to engage in international problem-solving. This approach broadens perspectives and fosters a sense of responsibility toward creating a more just and sustainable world.
Cultural Exchange and Study Abroad Programs. Cultural exchange and study abroad programs provide students with first-hand experiences of global diversity, fostering intercultural competence and global awareness. Initiatives like Erasmus+, Fulbright, and Model United Nations encourage collaboration with peers from different backgrounds, helping break down stereotypes and promote tolerance. Exposure to other cultures enhances adaptability, communication skills, and appreciation for diverse perspectives. These experiences also help students build international networks, which can lead to future academic and professional opportunities. By engaging with different cultural contexts, students develop the ability to navigate an increasingly interconnected world, strengthening their role as global citizens and future leaders.
Service Learning and Civic Engagement. Service learning and civic engagement encourage students to apply their knowledge to real-world global challenges, fostering empathy and problem-solving skills. Community service projects focused on poverty alleviation, environmental conservation, and public health initiatives help students understand global inequalities and take meaningful action. Collaborations with international NGOs provide hands-on experiences addressing disaster relief, education access, and sustainable development. These opportunities teach students the value of civic responsibility and empower them to become proactive global citizens. Through service learning, students gain a deeper understanding of social issues while developing leadership, teamwork, and ethical decision-making skills.
Multilingual Education. Multilingual education is key to global citizenship, enhancing communication, cultural empathy, and international mobility. Learning multiple languages allows individuals to engage with different cultures, reducing language barriers and fostering deeper connections with people worldwide. Proficiency in more than one language opens doors to diverse career opportunities in international business, diplomacy, and humanitarian work. Additionally, multilingualism improves cognitive flexibility and adaptability, crucial skills in today’s globalised society. By encouraging language learning from an early age, educational systems help students develop the ability to navigate cross-cultural interactions and contribute effectively to the global community.
Global Citizenship in Digital Spaces
Social Media and Digital Activism. Social media has revolutionised global activism by providing a platform for awareness, advocacy, and mobilisation. Movements like #FridaysForFuture, #MeToo, and #BlackLivesMatter have demonstrated the power of digital spaces in amplifying marginalised voices and pushing for social change. Online petitions, crowdfunding platforms, and viral campaigns allow individuals to support humanitarian causes, from disaster relief to policy reforms. However, digital activism requires responsibility to ensure ethical engagement and avoid misinformation. Global citizens can drive real-world change in an increasingly connected digital landscape by using social media to spread awareness, engage in meaningful discussions, and support impactful initiatives.
Online Learning and Virtual Collaboration. The rise of online learning has made global education more accessible than ever before. Platforms like Coursera, edX, and Khan Academy offer MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) that allow individuals to gain knowledge from leading institutions worldwide. Virtual classrooms, international webinars, and online research collaborations connect students and professionals from diverse cultural backgrounds, fostering cross-border learning and exchange. These digital tools break geographical barriers and democratise education, enabling lifelong learning and professional development. By engaging in virtual collaboration, global citizens expand their knowledge, build international networks, and contribute to the shared goal of global progress and innovation.
Combatting Misinformation and Promoting Media Literacy. The digital age has made information more accessible and increased the spread of misinformation and biased narratives. Global citizens must develop strong media literacy skills to critically evaluate online content and differentiate between reliable and misleading sources. Fact-checking, cross-referencing information, and recognising propaganda tactics are essential for responsible digital engagement. Promoting informed discourse requires individuals to question sources, engage in constructive debates, and avoid sharing unverified content. By fostering critical thinking and ethical online behaviour, global citizens can help create a more informed and truthful digital environment that supports democratic values and social progress.
Bridging the Digital Divide. While digital globalisation offers immense opportunities, millions still lack access to the internet, digital education, and technological resources. This digital divide disproportionately affects low-income communities and developing countries, limiting their participation in the global economy and education system. Efforts to provide affordable internet, expand digital literacy programs, and improve technological infrastructure are essential to creating an inclusive digital world. Governments, NGOs, and tech companies are vital in ensuring equitable access to technology. By advocating for digital inclusion, global citizens can help bridge the gap and create a world where technology benefits everyone, not just the privileged few.
Conclusion
Global citizenship in education and the digital sphere is more than just a concept—it is a call to action for fostering informed, responsible, and ethical global participants. As technology reshapes learning and communication, education must evolve to equip individuals with the skills to engage critically, collaborate across cultures, and address global challenges. By integrating global perspectives with digital tools, we can cultivate a generation of socially conscious and digitally literate citizens. Ultimately, global citizenship empowers individuals to understand the world and actively contribute to a more inclusive, sustainable, and interconnected future.
Please Add Value to the write-up with your views on the subject.
For regular updates, please register your email here:-
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
References:-
Pashby, K. (2011). Questions for Global Citizenship Education in the Context of the Digital Age. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 19(34), 1-25.
Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2011). Runaway Climate Change as a Challenge for the “Sustainability Mindset” in Global Education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 16, 31-50.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies, and Practices. Peter Lang.
United Nations. (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. UN Publications.
UNESCO. (2018). Global Citizenship Education: Preparing Learners for the Challenges of the 21st Century. UNESCO Publishing.
OECD. (2021). The Future of Education and Skills 2030. OECD Publishing.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Oxley, L., & Morris, P. (2013). Global Citizenship: A Critical Introduction. Routledge.
Veugelers, W. (Ed.). (2017). Education for Democratic Intercultural Citizenship. Brill Sense.
Global Citizen. (2022). How Digital Activism is Shaping Global Change.
Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2021). The Role of Technology in Global Citizenship Education.
The Guardian. (2021). How Social Media is Reshaping Global Citizenship.
Nestled in the northeastern Bay of Bengal, Saint Martin’s Island, known locally as Narikel Jinjira or Daruchini Dwip, is a small coral island spanning just three square kilometers. This unassuming landmass holds outsized geopolitical significance, located approximately nine kilometers south of Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar-Teknaf peninsula and eight kilometers west of Myanmar’s northwest coast. Despite its modest size and population of around 3,700, the island’s strategic location near critical maritime routes and its proximity to the Bangladesh-Myanmar maritime border have drawn the attention of regional and global powers, including the United States, China, India, and others.
Historical Context and Sovereignty
Saint Martin’s Island has a rich history intertwined with regional geopolitics. Millennia ago, it was an extension of the Teknaf peninsula, but rising sea levels submerged parts of the land, creating the island as it exists today. Named after Saint Martin by British colonial authorities in the 19th century, it was previously called Jazira by Arabian merchants who settled there in the 18th century. The island became part of British India in 1900, Pakistan after the 1947 partition, and Bangladesh following its independence in 1971. A 1974 agreement between Bangladesh and Myanmar, later affirmed by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in 2012, solidified Bangladesh’s sovereignty over the island, despite occasional tensions with Myanmar over maritime boundaries.
The island’s economy is modest, primarily driven by fishing, rice cultivation, coconut farming, and seaweed harvesting. Tourism is gaining traction due to its pristine beaches and coral reefs. However, its strategic value far outweighs its economic contributions, making it a focal point in South Asian geopolitics.
Strategic Location in the Bay of Bengal
Saint Martin’s Island’s location is its most defining asset. Situated near the mouth of the Naf River and close to the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar, it lies at the crossroads of vital sea lanes in the Bay of Bengal. The bay is a critical maritime zone connecting the Indian Ocean with Southeast Asia and serving as a gateway to the Indo-Pacific. It hosts some of the world’s busiest shipping routes, including those passing through the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint for global trade, particularly for energy supplies. Control over Saint Martin’s Island offers a vantage point for monitoring maritime traffic, conducting surveillance, and projecting naval power in this strategically significant region.
The island’s proximity to the Matarbari Deepsea Port, currently under development in Bangladesh with Japanese investment, further amplifies its importance. The port is set to enhance Bangladesh’s role in regional trade, and Saint Martin’s Island could serve as a complementary outpost for securing maritime routes. Additionally, the island falls within Bangladesh’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), granting access to marine resources like fish, oil, and gas, which adds an economic dimension to its strategic value.
Environmental and Economic Significance
Beyond its geopolitical role, Saint Martin’s Island is an ecologically sensitive area. As Bangladesh’s only coral island, it supports diverse marine life, including coral reefs, sea turtles, and various fish species. However, environmental degradation poses a threat—studies estimate that 70% of its coral reefs were lost between 1980 and 2018 due to anthropogenic factors like overfishing and pollution. Conservation efforts are critical to preserving this biodiversity, which also underpins the island’s tourism potential and fishing-based economy.
Tourism is a growing sector, with the island attracting visitors for its natural beauty and cultural heritage. However, a nine-month tourist restriction starting February 1, 2025, has been imposed to address environmental concerns and regional tensions, particularly with Myanmar. The island’s isolation during the rainy season, when rough seas cut off access to the mainland, underscores its vulnerability and strategic significance as a self-contained outpost.
Interests of World Powers
The Bay of Bengal has emerged as a theater of great power competition, and Saint Martin’s Island is a pawn in this geopolitical chessboard. The interests of major powers—particularly the United States, China, and India—stem from the region’s growing importance in global trade and security.
United States. The United States views the Bay of Bengal as a critical component of its Indo-Pacific Strategy, aimed at countering China’s growing influence. Allegations by former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in 2024 suggested that the U.S. sought control over Saint Martin’s Island to establish a military base or airbase, a claim denied by Washington. Such a presence would allow the U.S. to monitor Chinese naval activities, secure shipping lanes, and strengthen its strategic posture in the Indo-Pacific. The island’s proximity to the Strait of Malacca makes it an ideal site for surveillance and power projection. While the U.S. has officially dismissed these claims, the island’s strategic value aligns with its broader objectives, including partnerships like the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) with India, Japan, and Australia.
China. China’s expanding presence in the Indian Ocean, driven by its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), has heightened its interest in the Bay of Bengal. Beijing has invested heavily in regional infrastructure, including Bangladesh’s Cox’s Bazar port and a submarine base near Dhaka. Saint Martin’s Island could be a strategic foothold for China to monitor maritime routes and counter U.S. and Indian influence. Reports of Chinese intelligence facilities on Myanmar’s Coco Island, near the Strait of Malacca, underscore Beijing’s ambitions in the region. Control over Saint Martin’s Island would enhance China’s ability to project power and secure its energy imports, which rely heavily on these sea lanes.
India. As a regional power, India is vested in maintaining influence over the Bay of Bengal, which it considers part of its strategic backyard. Saint Martin’s Island’s proximity to India’s Andaman and Nicobar Islands, a key military outpost, makes it a concern. India is wary of foreign powers—particularly China or the U.S.—establishing a presence on the island, which could undermine its regional dominance. New Delhi has supported Bangladesh’s sovereignty over the island and provided economic and military assistance to counterbalance Chinese influence. Any foreign control over Saint Martin’s Island could serve as a “checkpoint” for India’s maritime activities, heightening tensions.
Other Actors. Myanmar’s proximity to Saint Martin’s Island has led to occasional tensions, including cross-border firing and disputes over maritime boundaries. The ongoing conflict in Myanmar’s Rakhine State, involving the Arakan Army, has spilled over into the island’s waters, raising security concerns for Bangladesh. Japan’s investment in the Matarbari port also reflects its interest in the region’s economic potential, which is indirectly tied to the island’s strategic location.
Geopolitical Tensions and Allegations. Saint Martin’s Island has been at the center of political controversies in Bangladesh. Sheikh Hasina’s 2024 claims that her ouster was linked to U.S. pressure over the island sparked widespread debate. She alleged that foreign powers sought to lease or control the island, a narrative her son later disputed. These accusations reflect the island’s role as a lightning rod for sovereignty, foreign influence, and regional security discussions.
Conclusion
Saint Martin’s Island may be small, but its strategic location in the Bay of Bengal makes it a coveted prize for world powers. Its proximity to vital maritime routes, economic potential, and environmental significance amplify its importance in a region of great power competition. The United States, China, and India, among others, recognise the island’s value as a potential outpost for surveillance, power projection, and securing trade routes. For Bangladesh, maintaining sovereignty over Saint Martin’s Island is a matter of national pride and a strategic necessity. As geopolitical tensions rise in the Indo-Pacific, this tiny coral gem will likely remain a focal point of intrigue and contestation, underscoring the complex interplay of power, sovereignty, and strategy in the modern world.
Please Add Value to the write-up with your views on the subject.
For regular updates, please register your email here:-
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
References:-
Online Research Foundation (ORF), Article: “St. Martin’s Island: A new flashpoint in the Bay of Bengal?” August 21, 2024.
The Financial Express, “St. Martin’s Island: A strategic jewel in the Bay of Bengal – Explained”, August 12, 2024.
India Today, “All about St Martin’s Island, its geopolitical importance amid Bangladesh crisis”, August 11, 2024.
Business Today, “The island that toppled a government: Was Sheikh Hasina ousted over this tiny coral gem in the Bay of Bengal?” August 12, 2024.
ETV Bharat, “Explained | Hasina And The Geostrategic Importance Of St Martin Island In Bangladesh”, August 11, 2024.
Firstpost, “Bangladesh crisis: What could the US gain from acquiring St. Martin’s Island?” August 11, 2024.
The Indian Express, “What is Bangladesh’s St Martin’s Island, under spotlight after Sheikh Hasina’s resignation?”, August 15, 2024.
Moneycontrol, “St Martin’s in Bangladesh: Did this island lead to Sheikh Hasina’s downfall?” August 11, 2024
ABP Live, “St Martin’s Island: Why This Tiny Island In Bangladesh Is Under Spotlight After Sheikh Hasina’s Ouster”, August 11, 2024.
The Business Standard, “Bangladesh strategically vital in Indo-Pacific”, February 28, 2022
Eurasia Review, “Bangladesh’s Balancing Politics with Big Powers in Strategic Bay Of Bengal – OpEd”, December 28, 2021
War on the Rocks, “The Bay of Bengal Could Be the Key to a Free and Open Indo-Pacific”, June 17, 2022
