Airpower – Air Marshal's Perspective

April 16, 2025

650: INDIA ENTERS THE LASER AGE: MK-II(A) DEW USHERS IN A NEW ERA OF DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY

My article published on The EurasianTimes website on 16 Apr 25.

India successfully tested its first high-energy laser weapon, the Mk-II(A) Laser-Directed Energy Weapon (DEW), on April 13, 2025, at the National Open Air Range in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh. Developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the 30-kilowatt laser system demonstrated the ability to neutralise fixed-wing, swarm, and surveillance sensors precisely at ranges up to 5 kilometers. The weapon can engage targets at the speed of light, using a laser beam to cause structural failure or destroy warheads, offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional ammunition with minimal collateral damage.

The test places India among a select group of nations, including the US, China, and Russia, with advanced laser weapon capabilities. DRDO plans to induct the land-based system within two years, with future upgrades for greater range and applications on ships, aircraft, and satellites. A more powerful 300-kilowatt “Surya” laser capable of targeting high-speed missiles and drones up to 20 kilometers away. Posts on social media highlight the weapon’s potential to counter aerial threats effectively.

Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) represent a transformative leap in military technology. They harness concentrated energy to neutralise threats with unprecedented precision and speed, a feat once only a part of science fiction. Unlike conventional munitions, which rely on physical projectiles or explosives, DEWs deliver energy through lasers, microwaves, or particle beams to disable or destroy targets.

Directed Energy Weapons

At their core, DEWs operate by focusing energy to create destructive effects. The most prominent type, laser-based DEWs, emit highly focused beams of light that travel at the speed of light (approximately 300,000 kilometers per second). When this beam strikes a target, it transfers intense heat, causing structural failure, melting critical components, or detonating warheads. For instance, India’s 30-kilowatt Mk-II(A) laser demonstrated its ability to neutralise drones and sensors up to 5 kilometers away by inducing catastrophic overheating in seconds.

Microwave-based DEWs, another category, emit electromagnetic pulses to disrupt or destroy electronic systems. These are particularly effective against swarms of drones or missile guidance systems, as they can disable multiple targets simultaneously within a wide area. Though less developed, particle beam weapons accelerate charged particles to damage targets at the molecular level, offering potential for future applications.

The advantages of DEWs are manifold. They require no physical ammunition, reducing logistical burdens and costs—engagements are estimated to cost mere dollars per shot compared to thousands for missiles. This cost-effectiveness is a significant advantage in modern warfare. Their speed-of-light delivery ensures near-instantaneous impact, critical for countering fast-moving threats like hypersonic missiles. Additionally, DEWs produce minimal collateral damage, making them ideal for precision strikes in populated areas.

Historical Context and Global Development

The concept of DEWs dates back to science fiction, with early inspirations from works like H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds. However, serious development began during the Cold War, with the United States and Soviet Union exploring laser technologies for missile defence. This historical context provides a deeper understanding of the evolution of technology. The U.S. Strategic Defence Initiative in the 1980s, often dubbed “Star Wars,” aimed to deploy space-based lasers to intercept ballistic missiles, though technological limitations stalled progress.

In recent decades, advancements in power generation, beam control, and thermal management have brought DEWs closer to battlefield reality. The United States has led the charge, with systems like the Navy’s 150-kilowatt Laser Weapon System (LaWS) deployed on ships to counter drones and small boats. Israel’s Iron Beam, designed to complement the Iron Dome, uses lasers to intercept rockets and mortars cost-effectively. China and Russia have also invested heavily, with China’s Silent Hunter laser system reportedly capable of disabling vehicles and drones, and Russia’s Peresvet laser designed for air defence and satellite disruption. These developments can potentially reshape international relations as countries with advanced DEW capabilities gain new strategic advantages.

Applications in Modern Warfare

DEWs are poised to revolutionise defence across multiple domains. On land, they offer robust protection against drones, a growing threat in asymmetric warfare. The proliferation of low-cost drones, as seen in conflicts like Ukraine, has exposed vulnerabilities in traditional air defences. Laser systems provide a sustainable countermeasure with their low per-shot cost and unlimited “magazine” (limited only by power supply). For example, India’s Mk-II(A) successfully neutralised a swarm of drones, a capability critical for border security.

DEWs enhance naval defence against anti-ship missiles, small boats, and unmanned aerial vehicles at sea. The U.S. Navy’s High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-Dazzler and Surveillance (HELIOS) system, integrated into destroyers, exemplifies this trend. For India, equipping warships with laser systems could strengthen maritime security in the Indian Ocean, a vital trade corridor.

In the air, DEWs are being developed for aircraft to counter incoming missiles. The U.S. Air Force’s Self-Protect High Energy Laser Demonstrator (SHiELD) aims to equip fighter jets with laser pods for missile defence. India’s vision to mount lasers on aircraft could enhance its air superiority, particularly against regional adversaries with growing missile arsenals.

Space-based DEWs, though controversial, represent the next frontier. Lasers could disable enemy satellites or defend against anti-satellite weapons, securing critical communication and reconnaissance assets. India’s planned satellite-mounted lasers underscore its intent to safeguard its space infrastructure.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite their promise, DEWs face significant hurdles. Atmospheric conditions like rain, fog, or dust can scatter or weaken laser beams, reducing their effectiveness. India’s DRDO addresses this through advanced beam control systems, but challenges persist in diverse terrains like the Himalayas. Power requirements also pose a barrier—high-energy lasers demand substantial electricity, necessitating compact, efficient generators. For mobile platforms, this remains a logistical challenge.

Cost and scalability are additional concerns. While DEWs are cheaper per shot, initial development and deployment costs are high. India’s Mk-II(A) required years of investment, and scaling to systems like the Surya laser will demand further resources. Finally, countermeasures like reflective coatings or electronic hardening could reduce DEW effectiveness, sparking an arms race in defensive technologies. It’s important to note that while DEWs offer significant advantages, they are not without vulnerabilities. Developing effective countermeasures will be a key area of focus in the future.

Future of Directed Energy Weapons

The global DEW market is expected to grow rapidly, fuelled by increasing threats from drones, missiles, and electronic warfare. India’s roadmap, which includes the induction of the Mk-II(A) by 2027 and the development of the Surya laser, positions the country as a key player. Collaborative efforts with allies could hasten progress, while indigenous innovation ensures strategic autonomy.

Beyond military applications, DEWs have the potential for civilian uses, such as removing space debris or disaster response (e.g., disabling hazardous objects). Their integration into multi-layered defence systems—combining lasers, missiles, and electronic warfare—will redefine warfare as technology matures.

Conclusion

Directed Energy Weapons mark a paradigm shift in defence, offering speed, precision, and economy unmatched by traditional systems. India’s successful test of the Mk-II(A) laser underscores its emergence as a technological power, capable of shaping the future of warfare. While challenges remain, the trajectory is clear: DEWs are not just the stuff of science fiction but a cornerstone of 21st-century security. As nations race to master this technology, the balance of power—and the ethics of its use—will shape the decades ahead.

Please Add Value to the write-up with your views on the subject.

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

Link to the article on the website:-

Peresvet, Iron Beam, LaWS & Now India’s Mk-II(A)! How Directed Energy Weapons Could Revolutionize 21st-Century Warfare

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

Pics Courtesy: Internet

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

References: –

DRDO Press Release. “Successful Test of Mk-II(A) Laser Directed Energy Weapon Conducted by DRDO.” April 13, 2025.

Firstpost. (2025, April 13). India’s ‘Star Wars’ weapon! DRDO tests laser that melts aerial threats. https://www.firstpost.com/india/indias-star-wars-weapon-drdo-tests-laser-that-melts-aerial-threats-13834676.html

India Today. (2025, April 13). DRDO tests laser-based weapon system. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/drdo-laser-weapon-system-destroys-drones-missiles-test-kurnool-andhra-pradesh-2527665-2025-04-13

LiveMint. (2025, April 13). In a first, India shoots down drones with laser weapon. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/in-a-first-india-shoots-down-drones-with-laser-weapon-joins-elite-league-of-nations-watch-video-11742305443609.html

NDTV. (2025, April 13). India’s first futuristic “Star Wars” laser weapon. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indias-first-futuristic-star-wars-laser-weapon-shoots-down-drone-swarm-5420597

The Hindu. (2025, April 13). DRDO tests directed energy weapon system. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/drdo-tests-directed-energy-weapon-system-that-can-disable-drones-missiles/article68989626.ece

Gormley, Dennis M. Directed Energy Weapons: Technologies, Applications and Implications. RAND Corporation, 2000.

Kopp, Carlo. “Directed-Energy Weapons: Physics of High-Energy Lasers (HELs).” Defence Today, vol. 6, no. 4, 2008.

Freedberg, Sydney J. Jr. “Lasers, Railguns & Directed Energy: The Future of War?” Breaking Defence, 2017.

Defence Update. “Directed Energy Weapons: Changing the Face of Modern Warfare.” 2024.

and International Studies (CSIS). Directed Energy and the Future Battlefield. CSIS Report, 2023.

April 13, 2025

646: PRECISION FROM AFAR: INDIA’S GLIDE BOMBS AND THE CHANGING FACE OF WARFARE

My Article was published on the EurasianTimes Website

on 13 April 25.

In early April 2025, India successfully tested two indigenously developed glide bombs. The first, Long-Range Glide Bomb (LRGB) named “Gaurav,” was tested between April 8 and 10, 2025, from a Sukhoi Su-30 MKI fighter jet of the Indian Air Force (IAF). This 1,000-kg class bomb, designed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in collaboration with Research Centre Imarat, Armament Research and Development Establishment, and Integrated Test Range, Chandipur, demonstrated a range close to 100 kilometers with pinpoint accuracy. The trials involved multiple warhead configurations and targeted a land-based site on an island, paving the way for its induction into the IAF. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and DRDO Chairman Dr. Samir V. Kamat praised the achievement, highlighting its role in enhancing India’s standoff strike capabilities and self-reliance in defence technology.

The second was the lightweight “Glide” bomb, called the SAAW (Smart Anti-Airfield Weapon), which the IAF and DRDO test-fired in Odisha. The SAAW is a lightweight, precision-guided bomb designed to target enemy airfields, runways, bunkers, and other reinforced structures at ranges up to 100 kilometers. Weighing approximately 125 kilograms, it features advanced guidance systems, including electro-optical sensors, for high accuracy. The weapon has been integrated with platforms like the Jaguar and Su-30 MKI, with plans to equip it on the Dassault Rafale and HAL Tejas MK1A. Three tests were carried out under varying release conditions and ranges, all successful. The DRDO Chairman announced that the SAAW is set for imminent induction into the armed forces, enhancing India’s precision-guided munitions arsenal.

These developments underscore India’s push toward indigenous defence solutions amid regional competition. Both bombs offer cost-effective, accurate, and standoff strike options to engage targets while keeping aircraft beyond enemy air defences. In the ever-evolving landscape of modern warfare, long-range glide bombs have emerged as a transformative technology, blending precision, affordability, and strategic flexibility. These munitions, designed to glide over extended distances to strike targets with pinpoint accuracy, have redefined how militaries project power, neutralise threats, and minimise risks to personnel and assets.

Long-Range Glide Bombs

Long-range glide bombs, sometimes called standoff glide munitions, are unpowered or minimally powered precision-guided weapons that rely on aerodynamic lift to travel extended distances after being released from an aircraft. Unlike traditional free-fall bombs, glide bombs have wings or fins that allow them to glide toward their target, often covering ranges from tens to hundreds of kilometers. They typically incorporate advanced guidance systems—such as GPS, inertial navigation, or laser homing—to ensure accuracy, even against moving or heavily defended targets.

The effectiveness of long-range glide bombs lies in their simplicity and adaptability. A typical glide bomb consists of several key components:-

- Warhead. The explosive payload can range from 100 kilograms to over a ton, depending on the target. Warheads may be high-explosive, bunker-busting, or fragmentation-based.

- Guidance System. Most glide bombs use a combination of GPS and inertial navigation for all-weather accuracy. Some advanced models incorporate laser or infrared seekers for terminal guidance, enabling strikes on moving targets.

- Aerodynamic Surfaces. Foldable wings or fins provide lift, allowing the bomb to glide efficiently. The glide ratio—distance travelled per unit of altitude lost—determines the weapon’s range.

- Control Unit. An onboard computer processes navigation data and adjusts control surfaces to keep the bomb on course.

When deployed, a glide bomb is released at a high altitude (typically 30,000–40,000 feet) and high speed. The launch aircraft’s momentum and altitude provide the initial energy, while the bomb’s wings extend to maximise the glide distance. As it descends, the guidance system corrects its trajectory, ensuring it hits within meters of the intended target. Some systems, like the U.S.’s Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) GBU-39, can achieve ranges exceeding 100 kilometers under optimal conditions.

These munitions bridge the gap between conventional bombs and cruise missiles. While cruise missiles are self-propelled and highly autonomous, they are expensive and complex. Glide bombs, by contrast, are more cost-effective.

Historical Context and Global Developments

The concept of glide bombs dates back to World War II, with early examples like Germany’s Fritz-X, a radio-guided bomb used to attack ships. However, these primitive weapons lacked the range and precision of modern systems. The development of long-range glide bombs gained momentum in the late 20th century as advancements in electronics, aerodynamics, and satellite navigation enabled greater accuracy and standoff capabilities.

The U.S. military’s Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) program, introduced in the 1990s, marked a significant milestone. JDAM kits transform unguided “dumb” bombs into precision-guided munitions by adding tail fins and GPS guidance. While early JDAMs had limited range, subsequent variants like the JDAM-ER (Extended Range) incorporated foldable wings, extending their reach to over 70 kilometers. Other nations, including Russia, China, and European powers, have since developed their glide bomb systems, such as Russia’s KAB-500 series and China’s LS-6 precision-guided bombs.

Recent conflicts, particularly in Ukraine and the Middle East, have showcased the growing prominence of glide bombs. For example, Russia has extensively used glide bombs like the FAB-500-M62 with UMPK kits, allowing Su-34 and Su-35 aircraft to strike targets from beyond the reach of short-range air defences. Similarly, Western-supplied glide bombs, such as France’s AASM Hammer, have been employed by Ukraine to target Russian positions with high precision.

Strategic Advantages

Long-range glide bombs offer several strategic benefits that make them indispensable in modern warfare:-

- Standoff Capability. Gliding bombs allow aircraft to strike from beyond the range of enemy air defences, reducing the risk to pilots and platforms. This is particularly valuable against adversaries with sophisticated surface-to-air missile systems.

- Cost-Effectiveness. Compared to cruise missiles, which can cost millions per unit, glide bombs are far cheaper. For example, a JDAM-ER kit costs around $20,000–$40,000, making it a budget-friendly option for precision strikes.

- Versatility. Glide bombs can be tailored to various targets, from fortified bunkers to mobile convoys. Modular warheads and guidance systems allow militaries to adapt them for specific missions.

- Mass Deployment. Because they are relatively inexpensive and easy to produce, glide bombs can be used in large numbers to overwhelm defences or saturate key targets.

- Reduced Collateral Damage. Precision guidance minimises unintended destruction, making glide bombs suitable for urban environments or near civilian infrastructure.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite their advantages, long-range glide bombs are not without drawbacks. Their unpowered nature makes them dependent on the launch platform’s altitude and speed, limiting their range compared to powered missiles. Additionally, while GPS guidance is efficient, it can be disrupted by electronic jamming or spoofing, as seen in conflicts like Ukraine, where Russian forces have employed electronic warfare to degrade GPS-dependent munitions. Glide bombs are also vulnerable to advanced air defences if launched within the interceptors’ range. For instance, systems like the Patriot or S-400 can engage glide bombs at certain altitudes and distances.

Global Proliferation and Future Trends

The proliferation of long-range glide bombs is reshaping global military dynamics. Countries like India, Turkey, and South Korea are investing heavily in indigenous glide bomb programs. At the same time, non-state actors and smaller nations seek access to these technologies through exports or reverse-engineering. This democratisation of precision strike capability could complicate future conflicts, enabling asymmetric actors to challenge stronger adversaries.

Future advancements in artificial intelligence and autonomous navigation will likely enhance glide bomb capabilities. AI-driven guidance could allow bombs to adapt to jamming or dynamically select targets in real time. Hypersonic glide bombs, which combine high speed with extended range and are also under development, promise to blur the line between bombs and missiles further.

Conclusion

Strategically, glide bombs shift the balance between offense and defence. By enabling standoff strikes, they challenge traditional air defence paradigms, forcing adversaries to invest in more advanced countermeasures. This arms race could drive up military spending and destabilise regions already prone to conflict.

Long-range glide bombs represent a pivotal evolution in precision warfare, offering militaries a cost-effective, versatile, and low-risk means of projecting power. Their ability to strike from a distance accurately has made them a cornerstone of modern arsenals, from superpowers to emerging nations. However, their proliferation and potential for misuse underscore the need to consider their ethical and strategic implications carefully. As technology advances, glide bombs will likely play an even more significant role in shaping the battlefields of tomorrow, balancing destructive power with the promise of precision.

Please Add Value to the write-up with your views on the subject.

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

Link to the article on the website:-

Bomb, Missile Or A Fusion? India Turns To Long-Range Glide Bombs That Proved “Effective” In Ukraine War

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

Pics Courtesy: Internet

Disclaimer:

References:–

Press Information Bureau (PIB), Government of India. “Successful Flight-Test of Indigenous Glide Bombs ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW'”. PIB, April 11, 2025.

Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), “DRDO Conducts Successful Trials of ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW’ Glide Bombs”, DRDO, April 10, 2025.

The Hindu, “India Successfully Tests Indigenous Glide Bombs ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW'”, The Hindu, April 12, 2025.

Hindustan Times, “DRDO’s ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW’ Glide Bombs Set for Induction into IAF”, Hindustan Times, April 12, 2025.
Livefist Defence, “Inside India’s Glide Bomb Program: ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW’ Take Flight”, Livefist Defence, April 11, 2025.

Observer Research Foundation (ORF), “India’s Glide Bomb Advancements: Strategic Implications and Regional Dynamics”, ORF, April 2025.

Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), “Enhancing Precision Strike Capabilities: The Role of ‘Gaurav’ and ‘SAAW'”, IDSA, April 2025.

Jane’s Defence Weekly. “DRDO’s Gaurav and Gautham: India’s Smart Glide Bombs Take Shape.” Janes.com, August 2023.

IISS. “India’s Precision Strike Capabilities: Strategy and Deployment.” Strategic Dossier, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2023.

Defence Decode. “Gaurav vs Gautham: Decoding India’s New Air-Launched Precision Bombs.” YouTube / Defence Decode Channel, March 2024.

RAND Corporation. “Emerging Military Technologies in South Asia: Glide Bombs and Beyond.” RAND Brief, 2023.

April 4, 2025April 4, 2025

639: STEALTH VS. COUNTER-STEALTH: THE EVOLVING BATTLE IN SIXTH-GENERATION AIR WARFARE

My Article was published on The EurasianTimes website

on 04 Apr 25.

In March 2025, Boeing’s F-47, the U.S. Air Force’s highly secretive Next-Generation Air Dominance fighter, was unveiled. It showcased advanced stealth capabilities and the ability to collaborate with drones. Simultaneously, the U.S. Navy is on the verge of selecting a contractor for its next-generation carrier-based stealth fighter program, the F/A-XX, which could potentially shift the global military balance.

In December 2024, China unveiled the J-36, a tailless, sixth-generation fighter jet characterised by its ultra-stealth capabilities. This design enhances stealth and aerodynamic efficiency for long-range missions, signifying a significant shift in aerial dominance towards China.

China has also demonstrated significant progress in counter-stealth technologies. Satellite imagery from late 2024 indicates China is constructing a counter-stealth radar system on Triton Island in the South China Sea. This system is expected to enhance China’s surveillance capabilities, potentially challenging the operational effectiveness of stealth aircraft in the region.

Reportedly, Chinese military scientists have developed a novel stealth material capable of defeating anti-stealth radars. Laboratory tests reveal that this ultra-thin coating can effectively absorb low-frequency electromagnetic waves from multiple angles, a feat previously considered unattainable.

These developments underscore a global emphasis on advancing stealth capabilities and counter-stealth measures, reflecting the urgent and competitive nature of modern military technology.

Stealth technology has transformed air warfare, enabling aircraft to evade detection by radar, infrared, and other sensors, thus allowing them to operate deep within contested airspace. Since its introduction, stealth has provided a significant tactical advantage, reshaping military strategies and doctrines. However, this advantage has not gone unchallenged. Counter-stealth technologies have emerged to detect and neutralise stealth aircraft, creating a dynamic, ongoing competition. With the advent of sixth-generation air warfare, this battle is poised to escalate, driven by cutting-edge innovations on both sides.

Evolution of Stealth Technology.

Stealth technology, often termed “low observable technology,” minimises an aircraft’s detectability by reducing its radar cross-section (RCS), infrared signature, and acoustic emissions. Its origins trace back to World War II with rudimentary efforts like camouflage, but it gained prominence in the late 20th century. The Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk marked a breakthrough. Its angular, faceted design scattered radar waves, while radar-absorbent materials (RAM) absorbed them, significantly reducing its RCS. The F-117’s success during the 1991 Gulf War underscored stealth’s potential, penetrating Iraqi defences undetected to deliver precision strikes.

Subsequent advancements refined stealth capabilities. The Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit, a flying wing design, eliminated sharp edges and incorporated advanced RAM, achieving an even smaller RCS. By the early 2000s, fifth-generation fighters like the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II integrated stealth with combat versatility. The F-22 features a sleek, aerodynamic shape, internal weapon bays to avoid protrusions, and coatings that dampen radar returns. The F-35 enhances this with sensor fusion, networking capabilities, and reduced infrared signatures through engine design. These aircraft exemplify stealth’s evolution from a specialised feature to a core attribute of modern fighters, blending low observability with supercruise, advanced avionics, and multirole functionality.

The technology hinges on several principles: shaping to deflect radar waves, materials like RAM or composites to absorb energy, and electronic countermeasures to mask emissions. However, stealth is not invisibility; its effectiveness depends on the opponent’s detection capabilities, setting the stage for counter-stealth advancements.

Current Counter-Stealth Measures

As stealth technology matured, adversaries developed methods to detect these elusive aircraft, exploiting their residual signatures. One prominent approach is using low-frequency radars like VHF or UHF bands. Unlike the high-frequency radars (X-band) that stealth designs counter, low-frequency systems detect larger structural shapes, bypassing some stealth optimisations. Russia’s Nebo-M radar, for instance, operates in these bands, potentially spotting stealth aircraft at longer ranges. However, their lower resolution limits targeting accuracy, requiring integration with other systems.

Infrared Search and Track (IRST) systems offer another countermeasure, detecting heat signatures from engines or airframe friction. Modern fighters like Russia’s Su-35 employ IRST to track stealth aircraft, especially during afterburner use when infrared emissions spike. Stealth designs mitigate this with exhaust shielding and cooling, but complete suppression remains challenging.

Passive radar systems represent a third avenue. These use ambient electromagnetic signals to detect disturbances caused by an aircraft’s passage. Systems like China’s DWL002 exploit this principle, offering a stealth-resistant, hard-to-jam alternative to active radar. Networked sensors enhance this capability, combining data from multiple sources to pinpoint anomalies.

Despite these advances, counter-stealth faces hurdles. Low-frequency radars struggle with clutter and precision, IRST is range-limited and weather-dependent, and passive systems require sophisticated processing to filter noise. For now, false positives and integration challenges further complicate their deployment, ensuring that stealth retains an edge.

The Stealth vs. Counter-Stealth Dynamics

Sixth-generation fighters, currently under development, promise to elevate this contest. Programs like the U.S. Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD), Europe’s Future Combat Air System (FCAS), and the UK’s Tempest aim to redefine air warfare with advanced stealth and counter-stealth innovations.

Stealth Advancements. Sixth-generation stealth may transcend current designs. Metamaterials, engineered structures with unique electromagnetic properties, could dynamically adapt to incoming radar waves, reducing RCS beyond what static RAM achieves. Research into adaptive camouflage might minimise visual and acoustic signatures, blending aircraft into their surroundings. Enhanced infrared suppression, possibly through novel cooling systems or exhaust shaping, could further mask heat emissions.

Integration with Other Technologies. Other emerging technologies amplify stealth’s role. Optionally manned or unmanned configurations, as envisioned in NGAD, allow riskier missions without pilot exposure. “Loyal wingman” drones, networked with manned fighters, could extend sensor reach or act as decoys, preserving stealth by misdirecting detection efforts. Directed energy weapons, like lasers, might replace traditional munitions, reducing protrusions and maintaining a low profile. These advancements aim to keep stealth aircraft ahead of evolving threats.

Counter-Stealth Advancements. Counter-stealth technologies are equally ambitious. Quantum radar, leveraging quantum entanglement, could detect stealth aircraft by analysing subtle disturbances unreadable by conventional systems. Though experimental, its theoretical range and precision threaten current stealth paradigms. Using dispersed transmitters and receivers, multi-static radar networks exploit reflections that monostatic radars miss, challenging shape-based stealth designs. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning enhance detection by analysing vast sensor data, radar, infrared, and acoustic signals to identify patterns indicative of stealth aircraft. China’s advancements in networked sensors, integrating space-based platforms and ground systems, exemplify this approach. High-altitude drones or satellites could also monitor large areas, reducing the stealth’s ability to hide in clutter. These developments suggest a future where no aircraft remains truly undetectable.

Strategic Dynamic in Context. Specific programs illustrate this duality. The U.S. NGAD emphasises stealth supremacy, pairing manned fighters with autonomous drones. Europe’s FCAS prioritises system-of-systems integration, potentially balancing stealth with counter-detection capabilities. China’s approach hints at advanced stealth and quantum-based counters, reflecting a dual-track strategy. This global race ensures that sixth-generation warfare will hinge on the stealth-counter-stealth balance.

Strategic Implications and Future Trends

The interplay between stealth and counter-stealth reshapes military strategy. If counter-stealth gains parity, stealth’s cost, billions per aircraft, may outweigh its benefits, prompting a pivot to speed, electronic warfare, or expendable drones. The F-35, costing over $100 million per unit, exemplifies this investment; effective detection could render such platforms vulnerable, shifting budgets toward countermeasures or alternative systems.

Tactically, a robust counter-stealth environment might force reliance on stand-off weapons, beyond-visual-range engagements, or networked operations with unmanned assets. Electronic warfare, jamming enemy sensors, could complement stealth, maintaining an edge even as detection improves. Conversely, if stealth outpaces counters, air superiority will favour nations with advanced fighters, reinforcing doctrines built around penetration and surprise.

Geopolitically, the U.S. seeks to preserve stealth dominance, while China and Russia invest in counter-stealth to challenge it. This rivalry drives innovation but risks escalation, as each side counters the other’s advances. Future trends may see cyber warfare targeting stealth and counter-stealth systems, exploiting their reliance on software. Space-based sensors could tilt the balance toward detection, while AI-driven autonomy might redefine engagement rules. The battlefield will grow more complex, with stealth and counter-stealth as pivotal elements in a networked, multi-domain conflict.

Conclusion

The contest between stealth and counter-stealth is a cornerstone of air warfare’s evolution. From the F-117’s debut to the sixth-generation horizon, stealth has driven tactical innovation, countered by increasingly sophisticated detection methods. As programs like NGAD and FCAS take flight, this battle will intensify, blending advanced materials, AI, and quantum technologies. Its outcome will dictate air combat’s future, shaping strategies, budgets, and global power. Neither side will claim absolute victory soon; their mutual advancement ensures a perpetual race, defining sixth-generation warfare and beyond.

Please Do Comment.

Link to the article on the website:-

Stealth Vs Anti-Stealth! Can China’s Cutting-Edge Radar ‘Trap’ U.S. F-47 As Next-Gen Warfare Heats-Up; Who Will Win The Race?

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

Pics Courtesy: Internet

Disclaimer:

References:-

Kopp, Carlo. “Evolving Radar Technologies and Their Impact on Stealth.” Air Power Australia Analysis, 2010.

Trager, Jason. “Stealth Fighter Evolution: Signature Reduction vs. Sensor Improvements.” MIT Lincoln Laboratory Report, 2019.

Raska, Michael. “The Sixth-Generation Air Combat System: Stealth, AI, and Network-Centric Warfare.” RSIS Working Paper Series, 2022.

Goure, Daniel. “Penetrating Counter-Air: The Future of Air Superiority.” Lexington Institute Report, 2021.

Sukhankin, Sergey. “Russian Advances in Radar and Electronic Warfare: A Challenge to Western Stealth?” Journal of Strategic Studies, 2020.

Axe, David. “Stealth Is Dying—And the U.S. Military Knows It.” Forbes, 2023.

Tirpak, John A. “Next-Gen Air Dominance: The Road to 2035.” Air & Space Forces Magazine, 2021.

The War Zone. “USAF’s Secretive Sixth-Generation Fighter Could Render Current Stealth Fighters Obsolete.” The Drive, 2022.

RUSI (Royal United Services Institute). “The Future of Stealth: Counter-Stealth Threats and Military Balances.” RUSI Analysis Report, 2023.

U.S. Congressional Research Service. “Fighter Aircraft Development: Trends in Stealth and Counter-Stealth.” CRS Report R46953, 2022.

Chinese Academy of Military Science. “The Future of Air Combat: 2030-2050.” Beijing, 2023.

NATO Science & Technology Organization. “Emerging Radar Technologies and Their Impact on Air Superiority.” STO-TR-AVT-321, 2023.