Tag: foreign policy

Posted on

536: SYNERGISING INDIA’S MILITARY AND DIPLOMATIC GOALS

 

Paper presented at the Vaishnav College, Department of Economics and Public Policy on 22 Nov 24

 

 

Synergy in military and diplomatic policy refers to the coordinated and complementary use of military and diplomatic efforts to achieve a nation’s strategic objectives. By fostering synergy between military and diplomatic strategies, nations can pursue cohesive, balanced foreign policies that leverage their full spectrum of capabilities to achieve sustainable security and influence. By aligning these two domains, governments can reinforce their influence, minimise conflict, and enhance security more effectively than using either approach in isolation. This approach is critical in an interconnected, multipolar world where isolated use of force or diplomacy may fail to achieve complex objectives.

 

Military Diplomacy

 

Military diplomacy strategically uses military resources and capabilities to foster relationships with other countries, support international stability, and prevent conflicts. Unlike traditional diplomacy, which focuses on dialogue, negotiation, and treaties, Military diplomacy employs military-to-military interactions to achieve political and strategic objectives.

 

Objectives of Military Diplomacy. One objective of Military diplomacy is conflict prevention. By engaging in active Military diplomacy, countries work to prevent conflicts from arising through mutual understanding and cooperation. Military Diplomacy also promotes regional stability. It can help stabilise volatile regions by addressing underlying security issues and aligning efforts among regional players. Military diplomacy is increasingly used to counter non-traditional threats and security challenges like terrorism, piracy, and cyber threats, which require coordinated international responses.

 

Key Aspects of Military Diplomacy. Military diplomacy helps countries work together to address both traditional and emerging security challenges globally by enhancing trust, cooperation, and mutual understanding among nations.

 

    • Military Cooperation. It includes joint exercises, training programs, and knowledge sharing. These activities help nations build trust, increase interoperability, and improve readiness for combined operations if needed.
    • Capacity Building. Through technical assistance, training, and equipment transfers, stronger nations help build the capabilities of allies or partner states, especially in regions where security stability is crucial.
    • Peacekeeping and Stability Operations. Military diplomacy may involve sending military personnel to UN or multinational peacekeeping missions to prevent conflicts, enforce peace, or provide humanitarian aid.
    • Confidence-Building Measures. These can include transparency in military movements, open communication channels, and setting up frameworks for information sharing to reduce the risk of misunderstandings that could escalate into conflict.
    • Military Agreements and Alliances. Bilateral and multilateral Military pacts, like NATO or strategic partnerships, solidify Military relationships, offering mutual support in security and Military matters.

 

Military Diplomacy and Foreign Policy

 

Military diplomacy is closely interlinked with a country’s foreign policy. It enables states to pursue strategic interests, build alliances, and project stability through military partnerships rather than conflict. Using military diplomacy, countries can influence regional and global affairs, reinforce diplomatic efforts, and protect their national interests without relying solely on traditional diplomatic or economic channels. Military diplomacy supports foreign policy goals.

 

Promoting Peace and Stability. Military diplomacy contributes to a country’s foreign policy goal of promoting peace and stability by building trust among nations and reducing the likelihood of conflict. Confidence-building measures, such as transparent military exercises and open communication channels, help decrease misunderstandings and foster cooperation.

 

Strengthening Alliances and Partnerships. Military diplomacy reinforces alliances and builds new partnerships supporting foreign policy objectives. Joint military exercises, training programs, and security dialogues are platforms for deepening ties with strategic allies.

 

Projecting Power and Influence. Military diplomacy enables countries to extend their influence and project power by maintaining a physical presence through military bases or frequent naval deployments. This approach allows countries to reinforce their foreign policy in regions of strategic importance.

 

Securing Economic Interests. Military diplomacy can safeguard economic interests, especially in critical areas like maritime security for trade routes. Foreign policy efforts to protect economic assets, such as sea lanes and energy resources, often involve military cooperation with key states. For instance, India’s naval cooperation in the Indian Ocean aligns with its foreign policy goal of ensuring free and open sea lanes crucial for its trade.

 

Combating Transnational Threats. Military diplomacy supports foreign policy efforts to tackle global challenges such as terrorism, piracy, and cyber threats. These issues transcend national boundaries, requiring collaborative security responses.

 

Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR). Military diplomacy aids in humanitarian missions, positioning a country as a responsible international player while fostering goodwill. Humanitarian responses, such as disaster relief operations, can soften foreign policy objectives by showing empathy and commitment to global welfare. The U.S. Navy’s response to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and India’s assistance to neighbours during natural disasters exemplify how military forces can promote positive relations.

 

Supporting Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Goals. Military diplomacy can be instrumental in arms control efforts, facilitating discussions and cooperative agreements that align with a nation’s foreign policy. Diplomatic and military dialogues, treaties, and verification mechanisms help prevent arms races and promote disarmament, as seen in strategic arms reduction treaties between the U.S. and Russia.

 

Indian Military Diplomacy

 

Indian military diplomacy has evolved significantly in recent decades, becoming a core pillar of India’s foreign policy. India uses military diplomacy to strengthen regional security, foster partnerships, and project stability, especially in the Indo-Pacific region, which is vital for economic and strategic reasons.

 

Strengthening Regional Partnerships. India has developed solid military relationships with neighbouring countries and key global powers. Through forums such as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue with the U.S., Japan, and Australia, India addresses shared security challenges, such as maritime security.

 

Capacity Building and Training. India provides training programs to military personnel from neighbouring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Maldives, and African nations. Through institutions like the National Military College and Military Services Staff College, India trains foreign officers, building ties and promoting a shared understanding of security.

 

Military Hardware Exports and Assistance. India has become increasingly active in exporting military equipment to friendly countries as a part of its “Make in India” initiative. India’s military exports include patrol boats, helicopters, radar systems, and artillery, with growing exports to nations in Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Indian Ocean region.

 

Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR). India’s military plays a key role in disaster relief operations within the region, supporting countries hit by natural disasters. Examples include assistance to Nepal after the 2015 earthquake, support to Sri Lanka during the 2017 floods, and aid to the Maldives during water crises. India’s swift response helps build goodwill and positions it as a reliable regional partner.

 

Maritime Security Initiatives. Given the Indian Ocean’s strategic importance, India has bolstered maritime security by enhancing naval cooperation, building coastal radar systems for smaller nations, and establishing agreements on port access and joint maritime patrols. Through its Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) and Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR) initiatives, India has reinforced its leadership in regional maritime security, ensuring stability along key maritime trade routes.

 

Military Exercises. India conducts joint military exercises with various nations, enhancing interoperability, readiness, and trust. Some prominent exercises include Malabar (with the U.S., Japan, and Australia), Varuna (with France), and Hand-in-Hand (with China), which aim to build capacity and understanding among the forces. India also regularly participates in United Nations Peacekeeping Missions, strengthening its commitment to global peace.

 

    • Exercise Yudh Abhyas. One of the most extensive bilateral exercises between India and the U.S., Yudh Abhyas aims to improve interoperability and strengthen defence ties.
    • Exercise Malabar. Initially, it was a bilateral exercise with the U.S., but Malabar expanded to include Japan and later Australia as part of the Quad. It’s crucial for regional security and showcases cooperation among key naval forces.
    • Exercise Varuna. This annual naval exercise strengthens Indo-French maritime cooperation, enhancing mutual understanding in complex maritime operations.
    • Exercise Garuda is an air combat exercise that enables both nations’ air forces to exchange best practices and enhance air combat readiness.
    • Exercise INDRA. Exercise INDRA is a tri-service exercise involving both nations’ Army, Navy, and Air Force. It highlights cooperation in counterterrorism and disaster relief operations.
    • Exercise Milan. Milan is a multilateral naval exercise that enhances regional maritime cooperation and focuses on building capacity for humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, and security operations.
    • Exercise Hand-in-Hand. This exercise aims to reduce tensions and build mutual trust between the Indian and Chinese armies, focusing on counter-terrorism drills and disaster response.
    • Exercise Cobra Warrior. Cobra Warrior is an advanced aerial exercise that exposes IAF pilots to NATO tactics, air combat manoeuvres, and mission planning.
    • Exercise Desert Flag. This multinational exercise focuses on interoperability and high-end air warfare, including combat drills and aerial tactics.
    • Exercise Tarang Shakti. India hosted the recent multi-lateral Air Force exercise.

 

Synergising Indian Military Policy and Foreign Policy

India’s military and foreign policy are deeply interconnected, with military policy as a strategic component of India’s broader foreign policy objectives. Together, they aim to safeguard India’s sovereignty, promote regional stability, and ensure peace and prosperity in an increasingly interconnected and multipolar world. India’s military policy supports foreign policy by building partnerships, countering security threats, and projecting India as a responsible and stable power.

 

Maintaining Sovereignty and National Security. India’s military policy is focused on securing its borders, especially given its complex relationships with neighbouring countries like China and Pakistan. India seeks to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity through diplomatic engagement and military preparedness. Diplomatic measures like peace agreements with China and Pakistan aim to resolve territorial disputes, while military preparedness, including a robust military presence along borders, backs these efforts. This approach reflects India’s focus on diplomacy first but with military readiness as a safeguard.

 

Strengthening Regional Stability and Security. India aims to stabilise South Asia by promoting peace and security. It seeks to engage constructively with its neighbours through military diplomacy, offering military assistance, training, and joint exercises. Initiatives like the SAARC Disaster Management Center and BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation) demonstrate India’s commitment to regional security, with military collaboration that aligns with foreign policy goals of fostering stability and cooperation.

 

Building Strategic Partnerships. India has pursued strategic partnerships with countries to address its security challenges. Military agreements, like the Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (LEMOA) with the U.S. and reciprocal logistics agreements with Japan and Australia, are integral to this strategy. These partnerships support India’s foreign policy by positioning it within a network of like-minded democracies interested in maintaining a rules-based international order.

 

Protecting Economic Interests. India’s military policy is critical in securing its economic interests, especially given its reliance on maritime trade routes in the Indian Ocean. By investing in naval capabilities and establishing maritime security initiatives, India ensures the safety of crucial sea lanes. India’s Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR) policy exemplifies this approach, aimed at fostering cooperation and ensuring a peaceful and secure maritime environment, which aligns with India’s foreign policy vision for a prosperous and stable Indo-Pacific.

 

Supporting “Act East” Policy and Expanding Influence in the Indo-Pacific. India’s Act East Policy aims to strengthen ties with Southeast and East Asia, where military diplomacy is essential. India’s military engagements, including joint exercises and naval outreach with ASEAN countries, align with foreign policy objectives to counterbalance China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Collaborations (without military alliance) like the Quad reflect India’s proactive role in the Indo-Pacific, enhancing military and diplomatic engagement to promote a free and open region.

 

Promoting Multilateralism and Global Peace. India’s commitment to global peace and multilateralism is reflected in its active participation in United Nations peacekeeping missions, where Indian forces contribute to peacekeeping in conflict zones. This supports India’s foreign policy of being a responsible global player and aligns with its image as a proponent of a multipolar world order. India also advocates for reforms in international bodies, such as the United Nations Security Council, aligning its military policy with its foreign policy’s broader goals of promoting equitable representation on the global stage.

 

Countering Terrorism and Non-State Threats. Addressing cross-border terrorism, mainly from Pakistan, is a central aspect of both India’s military and foreign policies. Military measures like surgical strikes and strategic deployments along borders are coupled with diplomatic efforts to bring international attention to the issue. India has built coalitions with nations affected by terrorism, such as the Joint Working Group on Counter-Terrorism with several countries and initiatives under the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to isolate terrorist-supporting states.

 

Disaster Relief and Humanitarian Operations: India’s military’s swift response to natural disasters, such as in Nepal after the 2015 earthquake or the Maldives during the water crisis, aligns with its foreign policy of being a responsible and dependable regional leader.

 

Challenges. India’s military collaborations in the Indo-Pacific may be perceived as countering China’s influence, potentially escalating regional tensions. Foreign policy must manage these partnerships sensitively to avoid open confrontation. India’s partnerships, particularly with the U.S., must be balanced with its goal of maintaining strategic autonomy. Military policy often distinguishes between deeper cooperation and avoiding entanglement in alliances.

 

Military diplomacy is a powerful extension of foreign policy, advancing national objectives through military cooperation, capacity building, and stability operations. It supports peace, economic interests, and regional security when carefully balanced, contributing to a stable and favourable international environment. India’s military policy is pivotal in supporting and advancing its foreign policy goals by enhancing security, building partnerships, and promoting stability within and beyond the region. Together, the military and foreign policy aims to position India as a stable, responsible power in a multipolar world, contributing to global peace, regional stability, and security while safeguarding India’s national interests.

 

Your valuable comments are most welcome.

 

644
Default rating

Please give a thumbs up if you  like The Post?

 

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

 

Posted on

535: BOOK REVIEW: THE FOUR AGES OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY, BY MICHAEL MANDELBAUM

 

Published on Indus International Research Foundation Website on 19 Nov 24.

 

 

Review by: Air Marshal Anil Khosla (Retd) PVSM, AVSM, VM

Former Vice Chief of Air Staff, Indian Air Force.

 

Michael Mandelbaum’s The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy offers a sweeping examination of the United States’ transformation from a fledgling nation into a hyperpower that dominates the global stage. By examining over two centuries of American history, Mandelbaum classifies U.S. foreign policy into four primary “ages,” each representing a distinct growth phase and influence in international affairs. The book dives into the evolution of American strategy and intent in foreign relations, framing each “age” as a response to shifting global circumstances and reflecting the country’s unique political culture. By dividing the country’s history into weak power, great power, superpower, and hyperpower, Mandelbaum provides a framework for understanding how the U.S. has adapted its policies to meet the changing needs of each era.

 

Mandelbaum’s narrative opens with the Weak Power era (1776–1865), during which America primarily focused on survival and independence rather than international ambitions. The young nation was more concerned with establishing a stable government and defending its sovereignty than projecting power abroad. This era was marked by the emphasis on avoiding European entanglements, which is evident in policies like George Washington’s Farewell Address, which urged against permanent alliances, and Thomas Jefferson’s expansion-oriented Monroe Doctrine. Mandelbaum highlights that during this period, the U.S. was relatively powerless in global affairs, focused on creating a continental nation and avoiding conflicts that could threaten its security and stability.

 

However, as the United States expanded westward and industrialised, it grew in strength and influence, eventually emerging as a Great Power (1865–1945). This era, Mandelbaum argues, was defined by America’s transition from a primarily inward-focused power to an increasingly assertive global player. Following the Civil War, the U.S. embraced a more interventionist stance, particularly in the Western Hemisphere, solidifying its presence through events like the Spanish-American War and the subsequent acquisition of overseas territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines. Mandelbaum examines how the U.S. began to assert influence beyond its borders, adopting a broader vision of its role in the Western Hemisphere and, later, in the First World War, as a global moral leader. Although hesitant to join the League of Nations after World War I, America’s involvement in the war indicated a shifting sense of responsibility for world affairs.

 

The author provides a nuanced examination of the Superpower era (1945–1991), marked by the Cold War rivalry with the Soviet Union. This era saw the U.S. and Soviet Union engage in a multi-decade ideological struggle, where each superpower sought to assert the dominance of its political and economic systems across the globe. Mandelbaum explains that American foreign policy during this time was driven by the doctrine of containment, which focused on limiting the spread of communism and Soviet influence. Key policies of this era included the Truman Doctrine, which pledged U.S. support for nations resisting communist subjugation, and the Marshall Plan, a bold investment to help rebuild European economies while staving off Soviet influence. Mandelbaum argues that the U.S.’s superpower status during the Cold War allowed it to shape international institutions and norms in unprecedented ways, often dictating the terms of global security and economic stability.

 

However, the Cold War’s end and the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991 heralded the onset of the Hyperpower era (1991–Present). Mandelbaum characterises this period as one of unparalleled dominance by the United States, as it stood as the world’s only remaining superpower. American influence permeated nearly every aspect of international relations in this new global reality. The U.S. was not just a powerful nation but, for a time, an almost uncontested force that set the agenda in international politics, economics, and culture. However, Mandelbaum is careful to note the challenges of this hyperpower era. Though the U.S. achieved a level of influence unmatched in world history, it has also faced significant struggles in this role. Post-9/11 conflicts in the Middle East, particularly the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, have been costly and complex, challenging America’s perception as a stabilising force. Mandelbaum argues that despite America’s overwhelming military and economic advantages, the hyperpower era has exposed limitations in achieving long-term stability through military interventions alone.

 

Mandelbaum’s The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy excels in its ability to contextualise complex foreign policy decisions within each era’s historical trends and pressures. By categorising U.S. foreign policy into these distinct “ages,” he provides a framework for understanding the ebb and flow of American influence as it adapts to an ever-changing international landscape. Throughout the book, Mandelbaum offers detailed analyses of significant policies, such as the Marshall Plan, NATO, and the recent “War on Terror,” examining how each has shaped the global order and influenced the U.S.’s position.

 

A significant strength of Mandelbaum’s book is his exploration of the interplay between American ideals and strategic interests. For instance, he discusses how the nation’s commitment to democracy and capitalism influenced its actions during the Cold War, balancing the moral impetus to protect freedom with the pragmatic need to counter Soviet influence. Mandelbaum also addresses the ideological basis of American foreign policy, reflecting on the country’s self-image as a “city upon a hill” and the belief in its mission to spread freedom and democracy. He explains how this ideology has fuelled foreign policy initiatives while creating tensions and inconsistencies—particularly when U.S. actions abroad have conflicted with its professed values.

 

The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy is compelling and informative. Mandelbaum’s historical perspective provides readers with a roadmap to understand how and why the United States has occupied such a central role on the world stage and how its position has changed over time. By framing U.S. foreign policy within the distinct categories of weak power, great power, superpower, and hyperpower, Mandelbaum offers a lens through which readers can analyse current American foreign policy, equipped with the historical context needed to understand its complexities.

 

The Four Ages of American Foreign Policy is essential for anyone interested in the history and future of American influence in global affairs. Mandelbaum’s clear, insightful writing and well-structured approach make the book accessible to both foreign policy students and general readers alike. This work reminds us that while America has achieved great influence, it also bears significant responsibilities and must continuously adapt to maintain its role in a changing world.

 

Your valuable comments are most welcome.

 

644
Default rating

Please give a thumbs up if you  like The Post?

 

For regular updates, please register your email here:-

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.

 

Posted on

Q & A SERIES: INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY, DEFENCE DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY POWER

 

Q-1   Has Indian foreign policy become more assertive about India’s interests? 

A-1

  • The trend for foreign policy is changing worldwide.
  • Multilateralism is changing to mini-lateralism.
  • The engagements between countries have become interest and issue-based.
  • India’s policy has changed from a policy of non-alignment to a policy of equidistance.
  • The engagements are governed by own interests, needs, and gains.
  • The world is accepting Indian stand on various issues.
  • Indian assertion level is appropriate, generally in take it or leave it mode without thrusting it upon others.

 

Q-2   Comments about India’s focus on Asian region and neighborhood.

A-2

  • Focus on Asia and the neighborhood has come a bit late with China having made inroads into our neighborhood adopting the string of pearls policy.
  • We need to be magnanimous in our approach towards our neighbours to retain them with us.
  • Like any other country, our global engagements are based on our interests first and then on ideology and principles.

 

Q-3.  Comments on India’s moral-based foreign policy, with a principled approach, and not using its military power for foreign policy objectives.

A-3

  • In agreement with the statement that “India foundationally remains a pacifist state, following moral based foreign policy, the strength of soft power and principled approach”.
  • It is not necessary to use force and military might to attain one’s foreign policy objectives.
  • Hard power can be used as a soft power as well using Military Diplomacy to achieve one’s objectives.
  • Foreign policy and military diplomacy need to work cohesively.
  • Notwithstanding the above, India has in the past used its hard power to attain its foreign policy objectives. Examples include Bangladesh liberation, Sri Lanka and Maldives operations.

 

Q-4.  India needs to spend more on its conventional military forces, building military capabilities and deterrence, due to its regional and global aspirations.

A-4

  • At the moment India’s necessity to invest in building conventional military power is governed more by its threat perception and need to guard its interests.
  • Regional and or global aspirations come next.
  • Military capability and deterrence are essential to be considered as a major regional power.
  • Military power alone is not sufficient, it has to be backed by economic clout and strength.

 

Q-5   In an age of comprehensive security, is military power by itself adequate?

A-5

  • While it is true that, military power is a significant ingredient of power projection it greatly impacts international dynamics and relations between nations.
  • It alone cannot achieve national objectives. It has to be backed by economic clout and a balanced all-round deterrence capability.
  • Earlier the debate used to be between money being spent on development or military capability.
  • Military power is essential even for unhindered growth.
  • The nature of warfare is changing. Firstly, hostile actions do take place even in no-war scenarios and secondly, the hostilities are not limited to the military alone.
  • New dimensions of warfare have emerged that affect the entire nation and demand a whole of national response.
  • The question of choice is not as simple as “either one or the other”. A balanced approach is required for multi-dimensional holistic capability enhancement.
  • Balance has to be maintained between:-
    • Military power and other tools of statecraft.
    • Conventional military power and other dimensions of warfare.
    • Military capability and capacity to wage war.
    • Quality and quantity of platform, weapons, and war-waging wherewithal.
  • Military capability and adequate deterrence are required first and foremost for safeguarding own interests, thereafter comes regional/global responsibilities and aspirations.

 

Q-6   India with its present stage of development, can ill afford to suffer a military setback, due to loss of deterrence as a result of inadequate defence funding.

 A-6

  • In agreement with the statement.
  • The minimum credible deterrence value of the military needs to be maintained at all times.
  • The minimum deterrence value depends upon, the number of enemies, their military capabilities, and their attitude.
  • In India’s case, the enemy’s capabilities are racing ahead creating a wide gap and the attitude has become more belligerent and aggressive.

 

Q-7. What does a ‘credible military capability’ entail?

A-7

Credible military capability to my mind would entail the following in sequence:-

  • Adequate deterrence.
  • The ability for strategic coercion.
  • Punitive capability.
  • Ability to wage war if required,
  • Adequate war endurance.
  • Ability to provide human assistance and disaster relief (HADR) domestically as well as externally.
  • Capability to exploit Defence Diplomacy.

Collective security is valid not only during the war but also to deal with grey zone operations during the time of peace.

 

Q-8.   What capabilities are required for military hard power to become an effective means of state-craft?

A-8

The military alone cannot achieve the national objectives. Besides aspects mentioned earlier areas which need attention are:-

  • Ability to meet challenges in the nonconventional and new domains of warfare including Nuclear, Biological, Space, Cyber, Electronic, and Information.
  • Any reorganization should be to cater for future challenges in these domains.
  • A robust defence industry and production eco-system are essential.
  • Intangible factors like morale and training are very important along with doctrine, strategy, and tactics.
  • Reach, precision, standoff, and a robust supply chain are equally important.

 

Suggestions and value additions are most welcome

 

For regular updates, please register here

Subscribe

 

 

References and credits

To all the online sites and channels.

 

Disclaimer:

Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from sources deemed reliable and accurate. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for purposes of wider dissemination.