My Article was published in the Life of Soldier Journal on April 25.
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has been in the spotlight for its recent achievements and challenges. The company has secured significant defence contracts, including a deal for LCA Tejas Mk1A fighter jets and a substantial agreement for Indigenous helicopters. HAL has also made strides in the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, enhancing India’s aerospace capabilities. However, the company has faced scrutiny over production delays and concerns raised by the Indian Air Force regarding aircraft availability.
The Indian Air Force (IAF) has been a stalwart in the pursuit of indigenisation, a strategic move to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers and bolster national security. Key initiatives include the induction of HAL’s Tejas fighter jets, the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) development, and the procurement of indigenous helicopters like the Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) Prachand. The IAF’s investments in indigenous UAVs, radars, and advanced weapon systems are a testament to its commitment to enhancing self-reliance. While challenges persist, a collaborative effort between the IAF, HAL, and private industry is pivotal in realising India’s vision of a robust and self-sufficient aerospace defence ecosystem.
India’s journey towards self-reliance in defence aviation has been long and complex, with the Indian Air Force (IAF) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) playing pivotal roles. Achievements, setbacks, and continued aspirations for indigenisation have marked the relationship between these two institutions. While HAL has been the backbone of India’s military aviation industry, the IAF has often raised concerns over delays, quality issues, and technological limitations. This article explores the evolution of this partnership, its challenges, and the way forward for India’s indigenous aerospace ambitions.
HAL was founded in 1940 as Hindustan Aircraft Limited and nationalised in 1964. Over the decades, it has been responsible for manufacturing, assembling, and maintaining various aircraft for the IAF, ranging from early license-built fighters to the Indigenous Tejas fighter jet. HAL has played a crucial role in India’s defence self-sufficiency by working on aircraft like the HF-24 Marut, Dhruv helicopters, and, more recently, the LCA Tejas and AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft) projects.
The Indian Air Force (IAF) has always been a strong advocate for the development of indigenous defence production capability, a key result area for the IAF. The IAF has played a crucial role in creating an aerospace ecosystem in India, operating indigenously built aircraft and those built by HAL under licence production, which has given impetus to the indigenous industry in the past. The IAF’s support for indigenised inductions and projects is evident in its involvement in the following initiatives:
Induction of LCA (IOC, FOC, Mk I and Mk 1A) and support to LCA Mk II and AMCA.
Induction of Ajeet and HF-24 Marut ac in the past.
Induction of AEW&C ac and support to indigenous AWACS project.
Induction of indigenous helicopter ALH and support to LCH.
Induction of Trainer aircraft (Kiran Mk I and Mk II, HT-2, HPT & HTT-40 aircraft).
Support to the replacement of Avro aircraft through the make-in-India route.
Integration and operationalisation of Astra Air to Air Missile and Brahmos Air to surface missiles.
Integration of weapons like the New Generation Anti-tank Missile, Smart anti-airfield weapons, new generation anti-radiation missiles, and Glide bombs.
IAF’s Dependence on HAL. HAL’s contribution to the IAF has been significant, with aircraft like the MiG-21, Jaguar, Su-30MKI, and Hawk trainers being produced or assembled under license. However, the IAF has sometimes expressed concerns over HAL’s efficiency, particularly regarding production delays, maintenance backlogs, and a lack of cutting-edge technology. The slow pace of the LCA Tejas program and delays in upgrades of existing fleets have strained the relationship between the two.
Success Stories: HAL’s Contributions to IAF. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has been the cornerstone of India’s military aviation industry, supporting the Indian Air Force (IAF) for over eight decades. From license-producing early-generation fighters to developing Indigenous aircraft and helicopters, HAL has made significant strides in enhancing India’s self-reliance in defence aviation. Despite facing challenges, its contributions have been instrumental in shaping the IAF’s combat capabilities, a fact that we, as a nation, should deeply appreciate and respect.
HAL’s association with the IAF began with the production of British-origin Hawker Tempest aircraft in the 1940s. However, its true contribution to India’s air power started in the 1960s when it began license manufacturing the MiG-21 under Soviet collaboration. The MiG-21 became the backbone of the IAF for decades, with HAL producing over 600 aircraft. These fighters played a crucial role in conflicts like the 1971 Indo-Pak War and the Kargil War (1999). During the same period, HAL made its first attempt at designing an indigenous fighter—the HF-24 Marut, India’s first home-grown jet. The lessons learned from this project laid the foundation for future indigenous aircraft programs. In the 1980s, HAL was critical in assembling and maintaining the SEPECAT Jaguar, a deep-strike fighter that remains a vital part of the IAF’s fleet. HAL later upgraded the Jaguar under the DARIN modernisation programs, equipping it with modern avionics and weaponry.
Su-30MKI: The Backbone of the IAF. One of HAL’s biggest success stories has been the license production of the Su-30MKI, India’s premier air superiority fighter. Since the early 2000s, HAL has built over 270 Su-30MKIs, making them the most numerous and capable aircraft in the IAF’s fleet. The company has also integrated indigenous systems into the Su-30MKI, such as BrahMos-A supersonic cruise missiles, further enhancing its strike capability.
LCA Tejas: India’s Indigenous Fighter Jet. The Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas is a landmark achievement for HAL and India’s defence industry. After initial delays, Tejas was inducted into the IAF. The improved Tejas Mk1A, featuring advanced radar, electronic warfare systems, and upgraded weapons, is expected to be inducted soon. Developing the Tejas Mk2, Twin-Engine Deck-Based Fighter (TEDBF), and fifth-generation AMCA showcases HAL’s progress toward advanced indigenous fighters.
Indigenous Helicopters: ALH Dhruv, LCH, and LUH. HAL strengthened the IAF’s rotary-wing capabilities with the Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) Dhruv and its armed variant, Rudra. Another significant achievement is the Light Combat Helicopter (LCH) Prachand, designed for high-altitude operations in Ladakh and Siachen. HAL has also developed the Light Utility Helicopter (LUH) to replace ageing Cheetah and Chetak helicopters.
The Challenges
Despite HAL’s significant contributions to the Indian Air Force (IAF), several challenges continue to hinder their partnership, affecting operational readiness and modernisation efforts. One of the most pressing concerns is production delays, which have consistently impacted the induction of critical platforms. The slow pace of Tejas fighter production, delays in the upgrade program, and prolonged timelines for overhauls have led to capability gaps in the IAF. These setbacks have forced the IAF to rely on older aircraft, delaying modernisation. Another significant issue is quality control, with HAL facing criticism over the reliability of its manufactured and overhauled aircraft. The users have raised concerns about technical faults, maintenance inefficiencies, and accidents of some HAL-built platforms, leading to questions about overall workmanship and durability. HAL’s slow adoption of new technologies has also affected India’s ability to match global defence standards. Unlike leading aerospace firms, HAL struggles with R&D investments and innovation, leading to dependence on foreign suppliers for engines, avionics, and weapon systems.
The Way Ahead for HAL: Strengthening India’s Aerospace Future
It is time for HAL to leave behind past setbacks, tackle challenges, and move on with renewed determination. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) must adopt a multi-pronged approach. Enhancing innovation, investing in R&D, fostering collaborations, and streamlining production can make it a stronger, future-ready HAL that is ready to drive India’s aerospace future, ensuring self-reliance and global competitiveness in defence manufacturing.
Enhancing Production Efficiency. HAL needs to streamline its manufacturing and assembly processes to reduce production delays. Modern automation, digital manufacturing, and lean production techniques can significantly reduce production time. Strengthening supply chains and increasing outsourcing to private-sector firms will also boost production efficiency.
Strengthening Quality Control. HAL must revamp its quality assurance mechanisms to address users’ concerns. A stringent inspection and testing framework at every stage of aircraft manufacturing and overhaul processes will ensure higher reliability and safety. Implementing global best practices and learning from established aerospace giants can help improve production standards.
Investing in Advanced R&D. One of HAL’s most significant drawbacks is its slow pace of technological innovation. To bridge this gap, HAL must increase investments in indigenous research and development (R&D), particularly in engines, avionics, stealth technology, and composite materials. Stronger collaboration with DRDO, ISRO, and academic institutions can accelerate innovation in next-generation aircraft and air combat systems.
Strengthening the Private Sector Collaboration. Public-private partnerships will be key to HAL’s future success. Companies like Tata, L&T, and Mahindra Defence are emerging as strong players in the defence aviation sector. HAL must leverage these partnerships for joint development, co-production, and component outsourcing, improving efficiency and reducing costs.
Reforming Organisational and Management Structure. HAL must transition from a bureaucratic public-sector enterprise to a more agile, corporate-driven entity to compete globally. Introducing performance-based accountability, faster decision-making mechanisms, and strategic planning frameworks will enable HAL to operate more efficiently.
Commitment to Future Programs. HAL must stay committed to high-priority projects like the Tejas Mk II, Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), and Twin Engine Deck-Based Fighter (TEDBF). These programs will define the future of Indian military aviation and ensure long-term self-reliance.
Focusing on Export Potential. HAL must actively market its aircraft, helicopters, and UAVs to international customers. The Tejas LCA, LCH Prachand, and Dhruv helicopters have attracted global interest. Expanding exports will generate revenue and establish India as a key defence exporter.
Conclusion
HAL stands at a crucial juncture and must evolve into a world-class defence aerospace manufacturer. By focusing on efficiency, innovation, private sector collaboration, and exports, HAL can not only strengthen the IAF but also contribute significantly to India’s goal of self-reliance in defence manufacturing (Atmanirbhar Bharat).
Please Do Comment.
For regular updates, please register your email here:-
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
My Article was Published in the Chanakya Diaries, Issue 2, Spring 2025.
The world of military aviation has witnessed a significant leap in technological advancements, particularly in developing fifth-generation fighter aircraft (5GFA). These next-generation fighter jets are equipped with stealth technology, advanced avionics, and superior weaponry, allowing them to operate in highly contested airspaces. As global military technologies advance, so does the need for air forces to adopt cutting-edge systems capable of responding to emerging threats. Acquisition of such advanced technologies is crucial for maintaining air superiority and securing national interests. However, India’s path to acquiring fifth-generation fighters has been filled with challenges, forcing the country into a quandary about securing these crucial assets for its Air Force. This article delves into India’s dilemma regarding 5th-gen fighter jets, exploring the complexities of the decision-making process, the challenges posed by current defence procurements, and the country’s broader defence and geopolitical considerations.
Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft
Fifth-generation fighter aircraft represent the pinnacle of modern military aviation, incorporating cutting-edge stealth, advanced avionics, superior manoeuvrability, and network-centric warfare capabilities. These aircraft are designed to achieve air superiority while minimising detection through radar-evading features such as internal weapons bays, composite materials, and aerodynamic shaping. Notable examples include the U.S. F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, China’s J-20, and Russia’s Su-57. Unlike previous generations, fifth-generation fighters rely on sensor fusion, artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making, and high-capacity data links to dominate the battle-space. Their integrated avionics provide pilots with unparalleled situational awareness, allowing seamless coordination with other forces and unmanned systems. High-thrust engines with supercruise capability enable sustained supersonic speeds without afterburners, enhancing operational range and fuel efficiency. Furthermore, their electronic warfare and cyber capabilities allow them to disrupt enemy communications and radar systems. While these aircraft offer unmatched lethality and survivability, their complexity and cost present production, maintenance, and procurement challenges. Nations investing in fifth-generation fighters seek battlefield dominance and strategic deterrence, as control of the skies remains a decisive factor in modern warfare. As military technology advances, these fighters continue to evolve, shaping the future of aerial combat.
IAF Challenges and Necessities
Prevailing Challenges. India is a major regional player, and due to its unique geographical location and geo-political environment, it faces a collusive threat (from its two nuclear-powered unfriendly neighbours) with significant chances of military conflict. This unique position dictates that the country be able to deter her hostile neighbours from any military misadventure singly or collusively. Besides land borders being the main reason for the dispute, the security of the IOR region would also be a major security necessity. IAF would be required to offer options to meet India’s domestic and regional security requirements.
Air Threat. For a considerable time, the IAF enjoyed an edge in modern combat aircraft over its rivals – the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). This situation is changing with the PLAAF transformation, China’s investment in aerospace research and development, and aircraft manufacturing. China has inducted its two home-grown stealth fighters (J-20 and J-31) in large numbers and has already flown sixth-generation prototypes. Pakistan continues to be in collusion with China. PAF has inducted Chinese J-10 and JF-17 aircraft and has desired to induct Chinese fifth-generation aircraft.
Urgent Necessity. The Indian Air Force’s current strength is significantly below its sanctioned level. Its indigenous development of fourth—and fifth-generation aircraft faces technological hurdles and time delays. In the face of prevailing challenges, India cannot afford to lag in its military capability. The impending air threat from China and Pakistan has made the acquisition of fifth-generation fighters an urgent and necessary priority to enhance the IAF’s deterrence value.
Acquisition Efforts
Collaborative Effort. India’s journey toward acquiring fifth-generation fighter aircraft began with an ambitious collaboration with Russia. In 2007, India partnered with Russia to co-develop the Su-57, also known as the T-50 or PAK-FA. This project was expected to yield a fifth-generation fighter with advanced stealth capabilities and cutting-edge avionics, making it a crucial addition to India’s fleet. While India’s collaboration with Russia began with great optimism, several issues soon emerged related to cost overruns, development delays, and technological shortcomings, leading to re-evaluating the program. 2018, after years of joint research and development, India decided to pull out of the Su-57 program, marking a pivotal moment in its fifth-generation fighter aspirations. The decision left India searching for alternative solutions.
MRFA Acquisition. The history of India’s Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) acquisition effort is marked by ambitious plans and evolving defence strategies to modernise the IAF’s fighter fleet. The origins of the MRFA initiative can be traced back to the Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender issued in 2007, which sought to acquire 126 fighter jets to replace the ageing MiG-21 fleet. After extensive evaluations and trials, the Dassault Rafale emerged as the preferred choice in 2012; however, contractual disagreements and cost escalations led to the eventual scrapping of the deal in 2015. In its place, the Indian government opted for a government-to-government deal to procure 36 Rafale jets in 2016 to meet urgent operational needs. The failure of the MMRCA tender to materialise in its original form highlighted the complexities involved in large-scale defence procurements, including cost considerations, technology transfer requirements, and offset agreements. In response to these challenges, the IAF redefined its requirements and reinitiated the procurement process under the MRFA program in 2019. The renewed effort sought to leverage lessons learned from the previous tender while emphasising indigenisation and the development of India’s defence manufacturing capabilities under the ‘Make in India’ initiative. Unlike its predecessor, the MRFA acquisition focuses more on domestic production, requiring foreign vendors to collaborate with Indian defence firms to establish local assembly lines and facilitate technology transfers.
Overview of the MRFA Acquisition Program. The MRFA acquisition program is a critical initiative by the Indian Air Force to acquire 114 advanced multi-role fighter jets to enhance its operational capabilities and replace its ageing fleet of legacy aircraft. Under MRFA, the IAF aims to procure state-of-the-art fighters that can undertake various combat roles, including air superiority, ground attack, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare, ensuring dominance in modern warfare scenarios. The MRFA acquisition process is structured under the ‘Make in India’ initiative, emphasising indigenous production and technology transfer to boost the domestic defence industry. The IAF issued a global Request for Information (RFI) in 2019, inviting proposals from major aircraft manufacturers worldwide. The procurement is expected under the Strategic Partnership (SP) model, which involves collaboration between foreign Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Indian defence firms. This collaboration required establishing production lines within the country and transferring critical technologies, reducing import dependency and promoting self-reliance in the defence sector. One of the essential requirements outlined by the IAF in the MRFA tender is the transfer of technology (ToT), which will allow Indian defence companies to gain technical expertise in aircraft manufacturing, maintenance, and future upgrades. The current situation stresses the inclusion of fifth-generation aircraft in the acquisition plans.
Domestic Solution: AMCA. India has pursued an indigenous solution to its 5th-gen fighter needs through the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). The AMCA is being developed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) under the Indian Ministry of Defence. It is intended to be a 5th-gen fighter with advanced stealth technology, super-cruise capabilities, and cutting-edge avionics. While the AMCA represents a step toward self-reliance and is seen as a critical component of India’s long-term military strategy, several challenges are associated with its development. The development of the AMCA has faced numerous delays. Initially slated for entry into service by the mid-2020s, it is now expected to enter service closer to the late 2030s. The project also faces significant technological challenges in developing a fighter of this sophistication. While progress is being made, achieving the same level of performance and stealth as the F-35 or Su-57 remains a formidable task.
Choices and Possibilities. Both the U.S. and Russia are aggressively pitching their fifth-generation aircraft. Besides outright purchase, India may explore collaboration and joint development programs or technology transfers (Stealth, Aero-engines and advanced avionics) that accelerate AMCA’s timeline. Limited acquisitions of F-35s or Su-57s focusing on training and operational familiarity while ensuring that AMCA remains the primary focus are also possible options.
The Foreign Procurement Dilemma
Given the delays and challenges of Indigenous development, India has to explore foreign procurement options for fifth-generation fighter jets. The United States, with its F-35 Lightning II and the Russian SU-57, has emerged as a potential source of these advanced aircraft. However, several geopolitical, diplomatic, and technical barriers complicate purchasing these aircraft.
U.S. Signals: F-35 Lightning II. The U.S. has been subtly signalling a potential offer of the F-35 to India. The aircraft first appeared in the Indian skies in the previous aero India 2023. Although Washington has not officially proposed a deal, diplomatic engagements and increasing defence cooperation between the two nations suggest that such a move could be on the horizon. Some analysts believe the U.S. could propose the F-35 as a deterrent against China, leveraging India’s growing security concerns to break its traditional reluctance toward American fighter jets. The F-35, developed by Lockheed Martin, represents the epitome of 5th-gen fighter capabilities. It is a highly advanced stealth fighter, but its suitability for the Indian Air Force (IAF) is debatable due to operational, geopolitical, and logistical factors. While the F-35 offers cutting-edge stealth, sensor fusion, and electronic warfare capabilities, making it a formidable asset against threats, its integration into India’s diverse fleet (Su-30MKI, Rafale, Tejas) would be complex and costly. The aircraft’s high maintenance burden, reliance on U.S. software and spare parts support, and logistical challenges in high-altitude operations raise concerns. Additionally, India’s deep defence ties with Russia and its commitment to strategic autonomy could complicate an F-35 deal. The U.S. has been selective about F-35 exports, prioritising NATO allies and key Pacific partners, making approval for India uncertain. With unit costs exceeding $80 million and long-term sustainment expenses, the F-35 may not be the most cost-effective option compared to expanding Rafale squadrons or accelerating the indigenous AMCA program.
Russia’s Pitch: The Su-57 Felon. Russia is presenting the Su-57 Felon as a possible solution for India’s air power needs. The offer is sugar quoted with an offer to reduce price, Integration of hypersonic weapons, ToT and easy payment options. The Su-57, initially designated the PAK FA (Prospective Airborne Complex of Frontline Aviation), began development in the early 2000s under the Russian Ministry of Defence. The aircraft was conceived as a multirole stealth fighter capable of air superiority and ground attack missions. Given India’s deep-rooted defence ties with Russia and its existing fleet of Su-30MKI fighters, Moscow sees this as a natural extension of its strategic partnership. However, India has been cautious about procuring the Su-57 due to previous setbacks in the Indo-Russian Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) project. While the Su-57 has promising features, the program has faced several challenges that have slowed its development and deployment. The aircraft has faced delays related to engine development and avionics integration. Moreover, there have been questions about the production rate and the number of aircraft that will be built in the coming years. The Russian Air Force has been slow to field the aircraft, and it remains unclear how many Su-57s will ultimately be deployed, particularly as Russia faces significant budgetary constraints and competing priorities.
Comparative Analysis. The Su-57’s development and operational capabilities are often compared to the U.S. F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II, representing American stealth technology’s pinnacle. While the Su-57 has similar features, such as stealth and advanced avionics, it lags in some performance areas. For example, the F-22 is generally considered superior regarding stealth and overall aerodynamics, while the F-35 is unrivalled in sensor fusion and multirole capabilities. However, the Su-57 holds unique advantages that could make it a formidable platform in specific scenarios. Its super manoeuvrability and advanced sensor capabilities make it highly suited for air-to-air combat and could give it an edge over Western fighters in certain situations. Moreover, its weapons capacity and the potential future integration of hypersonic weapons give it a longer-range and more potent offensive capability than current Western fighters.
Indigenous Effort.
Push for Indigenous Development: The AMCA Program. India’s exit from the Su-57 program signalled a renewed focus on indigenous development. Under pressure to modernise and enhance its capabilities, India pushed to develop its fifth-generation fighter. The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program was born out of this necessity. The AMCA was conceived as India’s first fully indigenous fifth-generation fighter. The project envisions incorporating stealth, advanced avionics, supercruise and multi-role capabilities. While the AMCA represents a significant leap forward for India’s indigenous defence capabilities, its development has not been without challenges. The program has faced technological hurdles, financial constraints, and inordinate delays. The prototype of the AMCA is expected to take flight in the late 2020s, with full-scale production not anticipated until the early 2040s. The AMCA is crucial to India’s long-term defence strategy. Its delayed timeline and high costs mean the country must consider alternatives soon to fill the capability gap.
Effect on the AMCA Development. India’s procurement of foreign fifth-generation fighter aircraft could positively or negatively affect the development of its Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program. On the one hand, it could gain valuable insights into the design and technology of a fifth-generation fighter aircraft, including stealth capabilities, advanced avionics, and engine performance. This could accelerate the learning curve for Indian engineers and help improve AMCA’s design. On the other hand, foreign procurement could divert attention and resources from the AMCA project, as both programs require significant investment and focus. This could delay AMCA’s development as funding and manpower may be reallocated. While foreign procurement might provide a short-term solution, procuring it would reinforce India’s dependency on foreign technology, which contradicts the AMCA’s goal of achieving greater self-reliance in defence technology. It might also delay the domestic innovation necessary to produce the AMCA independently.
Procurement Considerations: A Tight Rope Walk.
India’s pursuit of fifth-generation fighter aircraft (FGFA) is a complex balancing act, requiring careful evaluation of strategic, operational, and geopolitical factors. Despite the aggressive pitches from Russia and the U.S., India remains steadfast in its commitment to self-reliance. The country has several valid concerns about acquiring stealth fighters from external sources. The procurement decision must balance national security imperatives with long-term self-reliance goals.
Financial Constraints. While the need for advanced fighter aircraft is pressing, India’s defence budget remains constrained. The costs of acquiring 5th-gen fighters—whether through foreign procurement or domestic development—are substantial.
Strategic Autonomy. India has historically maintained strategic autonomy in defence procurement. Outright procurement of fifth-generation fighters would increase dependency on foreign suppliers for maintenance, spares, and software updates. However, developing an indigenous FGFA is time-intensive and costly, necessitating interim solutions such as collaborations or selective acquisitions. Balancing these factors ensures India can act independently in future conflicts without external constraints.
Operational Sovereignty. Fifth-generation fighters rely heavily on integrated software, sensor fusion, and artificial intelligence, requiring continuous updates and security oversight. Procuring an FGFA from the U.S. or Russia may come with software black boxes, limiting India’s ability to modify or customise the aircraft to suit its operational needs. In contrast, an indigenous program like the AMCA would ensure complete control over mission configurations, electronic warfare systems, and weapons integration. India risks operational constraints without complete control in scenarios where its strategic interests diverge from supplier nations.
Transfer of Technology (ToT). India has consistently demanded significant technology transfer as part of its defence procurements. One of the most crucial considerations in FGFA procurement is access to critical technologies such as stealth coatings, advanced radar systems, and aero engines. Nations that export fifth-generation fighters typically impose strict restrictions on technology transfers to protect proprietary designs and maintain their competitive edge. India must negotiate deals that ensure meaningful technology absorption, aiding AMCA’s long-term development.
Interoperability Issues. India operates a diverse fleet comprising Russian, French, Israeli, and indigenous aircraft, leading to interoperability challenges. Integrating an FGFA with existing platforms is critical, especially for network-centric warfare. American platforms, such as the F-35, rely on proprietary Link 16 data-sharing protocols, which may not be compatible with India’s indigenous combat management systems. On the other hand, Russian fighters align with existing IAF infrastructure but lack the networking capabilities of Western aircraft. Any FGFA procurement must ensure seamless integration with India’s Integrated Air Command and Control System (IACCS) while avoiding security vulnerabilities tied to foreign command structures.
Reliance and Reliability Concerns. Fifth-generation fighters require a robust supply chain for spare parts, software updates, and maintenance. India’s experience with Russian platforms, such as the Su-30MKI, has shown that supply bottlenecks can impact fleet availability. Similarly, reliance on the U.S. for F-35 components could expose India to geopolitical leverage, where supply disruptions may occur due to policy shifts. An indigenous FGFA would mitigate these risks. However, India must bridge the gap in manufacturing critical components, such as high-thrust jet engines and low-observable coatings, to ensure long-term sustainability.
Geopolitical Pressures. India’s FGFA decision is deeply entangled in global power dynamics. Acquiring an American fighter would enhance ties with QUAD allies (U.S., Japan, Australia) but could strain India’s strategic partnership with Russia. Conversely, a Russian FGFA might provoke U.S. sanctions under CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act), complicating India’s defence cooperation with Western nations. Thus, any procurement choice must navigate these external influences without compromising national security.
Way Ahead
India’s quest for fifth-generation fighter aircraft is emblematic of the broader challenges emerging powers face in the 21st century. While the country has made significant strides in developing Indigenous defence capabilities, the path to acquiring fifth-generation fighters remains fraught with challenges. The choices India makes in the coming years will shape its defence posture and air superiority in the decades ahead. While the AMCA holds promise for India’s long-term goals, the immediate need for advanced fighter aircraft means that foreign options, including the F-35 or SU-57, will likely remain in play despite the geopolitical and financial challenges they present.
India’s success in this endeavour will depend on its ability to integrate technology, manage its defence budget, and forge strategic partnerships that advance its security interests in a rapidly evolving global landscape. Given the complexity of fifth-generation fighter procurement, India must focus on accelerating the AMCA program while exploring selective technology partnerships. A dedicated task force with a top-down approach could ensure timely execution. Increased funding, private sector involvement, and strategic technology acquisitions could further bolster the program.
India must balance Indigenous development with the need for foreign procurement while navigating a complex geopolitical landscape. While India will likely continue seeking a combination of foreign procurements and domestic development, the path forward will require careful navigation of technological and strategic challenges. Ultimately, India’s ability to field a fleet of 5th-gen fighters will depend on its ability to balance these competing demands while securing the necessary resources and partnerships to maintain its regional and global standing.
Conclusion
The stealth fighter war is not just about aircraft but about India’s position in the global defence landscape. The choices made in the coming years will define India’s air power for decades. While Aero India 2025 will serve as a grand stage for the U.S. and Russia to showcase their best fighters, India must navigate this battle carefully. Whether it chooses a limited acquisition, a joint development initiative, or a complete rejection of external options, one thing is clear: India’s future in stealth aviation will be determined by its ability to balance strategic autonomy with practical air power needs.
Please Do Comment.
For regular updates, please register your email here:-
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
References:-
Dyer, G. (2017). India’s Role in Global Security: An Assessment of Its Military and Strategic Options. Oxford University Press. Covers India’s military strategies and defence procurement policies, giving context to its fifth-generation fighter aircraft decisions.
Tiwari, R. (2020). India’s Aviation Power: The Development of India’s Military Aviation. Routledge. This book focuses on India’s aviation capabilities, history, and future trajectory, including the fifth-generation fighter aircraft.
Sarma, B. (2021). Fifth-Generation Aircraft and the Changing Nature of Air Combat: A Global Perspective. Springer. This book analyses the technologies and capabilities defining fifth-generation aircraft and how different countries adopt them.
Pant, H. V. (2018). India’s Strategic Culture and Military Modernisation: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach. Routledge. Offers insight into India’s military modernisation strategies and how they affect decisions about future aircraft acquisitions.
Bansal, S. (2022). “Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft: The India Dilemma”, Strategic Affairs Journal, 14(3), pp. 245-268. This article addresses India’s balancing act between domestic capabilities, foreign partnerships, and defence priorities regarding fifth-generation fighters.
Chaudhury, S. (2020). “India’s Ambitious Fighter Program and the Quest for the AMCA”, The Military Review, 102(4), pp. 60-75. A detailed analysis of India’s AMCA project and the prospects of its success in the context of competing international options.
Indian Ministry of Defence (2021). India’s Future Aircraft Procurement Strategy: A Vision for the Next Decade. Government of India. Government-published paper detailing India’s strategic requirements and procurement strategy, including pursuing fifth-generation fighters.
RAND Corporation (2021). “Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft: A Global Overview”. RAND Corporation. A comprehensive analysis of the global fifth-generation fighter market, including India’s potential partners and competitors.
IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly (2019). “The Future of Combat Aircraft: A Comparative Study”, 56(8), pp. 32-45. This report compares the capabilities of fifth-generation fighters, focusing on the Su-57, F-35, and AMCA, with a section on India’s defence procurement options.
Shukla, A. (2021). “India’s Fighter Jet Dilemma: Will AMCA Be the Answer?” Livefist Defence. https://www.livefistdefence.com. A detailed exploration of the AMCA program and India’s obstacles in developing its fifth-generation aircraft.
My Article published on the Chanakya Forum Website on 10 Jan 25
India’s fighter aircraft production journey reflects a blend of significant achievements and persistent challenges. The licensed production of platforms like the Mig-21, Sukhoi Su-30MKI and SEPECAT Jaguar has strengthened the Indian Air Force (IAF) while providing invaluable experience in manufacturing and technology integration. Significant success includes the past development of the Indigenous HF-24 Marut and the recent Tejas aircraft with state-of-the-art avionics, composite materials, and a delta-wing design. Tejas has become a symbol of India’s aerospace ambitions. Additionally, the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project, aimed at producing a fifth-generation stealth fighter, underscores India’s aspirations to join global defence leaders. However, India’s fighter production has faced notable failures. Early efforts, such as the HF-24 Marut, were limited by underpowered engines and technological constraints. Delays in indigenous projects like Tejas Mk2 and AMCA and dependency on imported engines and critical systems have hampered timelines. Additionally, quality control and production scalability remain areas of concern. Despite these challenges, initiatives like “Make in India”, a government initiative to encourage manufacturing in India, and increased private sector participation foster a robust defence manufacturing ecosystem. By addressing these issues, India has the potential to emerge as a global player in fighter aircraft production and exports.
Journey So Far
India’s journey in fighter aircraft production, spanning several decades, began in the post-independence era. The timeline of this journey is marked by key milestones, from the initial reliance on imports to the transition towards licensed production and indigenous development. Below is a chronological overview of India’s significant achievements and persistent challenges in fighter aircraft production:-
In the 1950s, India’s first steps in aircraft production were through licensed manufacturing agreements with foreign companies. The De Havilland Vampire, a British jet fighter, was the first jet aircraft inducted into the Indian Air Force (IAF). Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) assembled the Vampire under license, marking India’s entry into jet aircraft production. In addition, HAL produced the Hawker Hunter under the UK’s license. The Hunter served as a versatile fighter-bomber during the 1965 and 1971 wars. HAL also produced Folland Gnat under license. Gnat was known as the “Sabre Slayer” for its success against the Pakistani Air Force in 1965. India later developed an improved version called Ajeet in the 1970s.
During the 1970s–1980s, India began exploring indigenous fighter aircraft development while continuing licensed production. The HF-24 Marut was India’s first indigenously developed jet fighter. Although it had limited operational success due to underpowered engines, it was a milestone in India’s aerospace development. During the same period, India entered into a series of agreements with the Soviet Union to produce MiG-21 fighters under license. HAL manufactured over 600 MiG-21 aircraft, which became the backbone of the IAF for decades. These projects helped HAL acquire critical knowledge in jet manufacturing.
In the 1990s, India procured the Anglo-French SEPECAT Jaguar for deep strike roles and began producing it under license at HAL. This period saw India modernise its air force with more advanced fighters. The Mirage 2000, a French multirole fighter, was inducted to address India’s capability gaps. While HAL did not produce this aircraft, it supported its maintenance and upgrades. India signed a deal with Russia for the licensed production of the Su-30MKI, a highly advanced multirole fighter. HAL has produced over 270 Su-30MKIs, which remain a critical component of the IAF.
In the last two decades, India’s focus has shifted towards indigenous fighter aircraft production, particularly with the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) program. Designed by the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and produced by HAL, the Tejas program marks a significant milestone in India’s return to indigenous fighter development. Despite delays, the Tejas program eventually achieved operational clearance, with the Mk1 variant in service and Mk1A and Mk2 under development. Work is underway to develop Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), a fifth-generation fighter under development by DRDO and HAL, aiming to equip the IAF with stealth capabilities.
Leapfrog Strategy
India’s leapfrog strategy for fighter aircraft development and production is a strategic imperative, aiming to bypass incremental progress and achieve advanced capabilities in a shorter timeframe. It focuses on cutting-edge technologies rather than following a linear development path. The need for strategic autonomy and rapid modernisation of the Indian Air Force drives this approach. India’s leapfrog strategy has shown promise but faces mixed results. The strategy tries to leverage foreign collaboration for critical technologies, private sector involvement, and government initiatives like “Make in India.” On the one hand, developing advanced platforms like the HAL Tejas demonstrates progress. Despite initial delays, the Tejas program has evolved into a modern, capable aircraft. However, challenges persist, raising questions about its effectiveness. Persistent project delays, reliance on imported engines and key technologies, and research and development capabilities gaps have hindered progress. Furthermore, scaling up production to meet the Indian Air Force’s demands remains challenging. The approach’s success depends on addressing these systemic issues, accelerating timelines, and building a stronger domestic defence ecosystem. It’s a work in progress with tangible but incomplete results.
Development and Production Ecosystem
India’s fighter aircraft development and production ecosystem is a collaborative effort, combining users, public and private sector research and development and manufacturing agencies, and government-led initiatives to achieve self-reliance and reduce import dependency. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) are at the forefront of this ecosystem, driving R&D and production. However, the private sector, with companies like Tata Advanced Systems, Larsen & Toubro, and Adani Defence, is increasingly pivotal in manufacturing components, subsystems, and assemblies. Government initiatives such as “Make in India” and establishing defence industrial corridors in Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh have further bolstered the ecosystem by encouraging innovation, attracting foreign investment, and creating a favourable environment for defence manufacturing. These corridors are designed to streamline production and reduce costs, making India a competitive global player. Despite these advancements, challenges remain. Nonetheless, the ecosystem is evolving steadily with sustained policy support, greater private sector involvement, and a focus on innovation.
Challenges
Fighter aircraft production in India faces technical, financial, operational, and policy challenges. Addressing these challenges is crucial to achieving self-reliance in defence manufacturing.
Designing and producing 5th-generation fighters involves cutting-edge technology in stealth, advanced materials, and electronics, where India is still catching up. Critical technologies are primarily imported. India’s indigenous engine development program, such as the Kaveri engine, has faced setbacks, forcing reliance on foreign engines like the General Electric F404 and F414 for the Tejas. A significant portion of critical components, including avionics, engines, and weapons systems, are imported, which increases costs and reduces self-reliance. Dependence on foreign suppliers creates vulnerabilities in geopolitical tensions, as witnessed by delays in acquiring components during global conflicts or supply chain disruptions.
The aerospace industry ecosystem in India, including tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers, is underdeveloped compared to global standards. There are limited domestic facilities for high-end research, testing, and simulation. HAL dominates military aircraft production, leaving limited scope for private sector participation, which could otherwise bring efficiency, innovation, and competition.
Programs like the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas have taken decades to move from concept to operational deployment, leading to the obsolescence of certain features. Delays often lead to significant cost overruns, which put additional pressure on defence budgets and make indigenous programs less competitive than foreign options. Excessive bureaucracy usually slows down India’s defence procurement and manufacturing processes, causing delays in decision-making and execution. Fighter aircraft production requires massive investments in R&D, infrastructure, and production lines, straining defence budgets. Adequate budget needs to be allocated for these.
Designing and manufacturing advanced fighter jets require highly specialised skills, which are still developing in India. Many skilled engineers and scientists prefer opportunities abroad due to better resources and working conditions. Issues with consistency and quality control in manufacturing have occasionally plagued indigenous projects. Indigenous aircraft often face concerns regarding reliability and maintenance, which can impact their adoption by the armed forces and export potential.
Competing in the international market is challenging, as buyers often prefer aircraft from established manufacturers with long track records. Indian indigenous fighters compete against proven and readily available foreign options, which usually have superior capabilities. Due to intense competition, foreign collaborators often hesitate to share cutting-edge technologies, limiting the depth of technology transfer agreements. India’s defence offset policy, aimed at boosting domestic production through foreign collaborations, has seen mixed success.
Way Ahead
India has made significant strides in indigenous fighter aircraft production but faces challenges in achieving global competitiveness and self-reliance. The future of fighter aircraft production in India lies in addressing these challenges with a focused, multi-pronged strategy.
Leverage lessons learned from the Tejas program to avoid delays and cost overruns. Support and prioritise the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, ensuring adequate funding, streamlined processes, and timely execution. Focus on Core Technologies. Accelerate the development of indigenous critical technologies like jet engines (e.g., Kaveri engine), AESA radars, stealth coatings, and advanced avionics.
Build a Robust Defence Manufacturing Ecosystem. Strengthen Indigenous R&D and technology development. Encourage tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers to build capabilities in aerospace components, materials, and electronics to develop reliable supply chains. Provide financial incentives and technical support to MSMEs involved in defence manufacturing. Promote private sector participation. Encourage private players to take on larger roles in aircraft production, from components to complete systems. Establish dedicated aerospace clusters in states to promote innovation and manufacturing at scale.
Enhancing Policy Frameworks and Governance. Simplify bureaucratic procedures to streamline the approval process for defence projects, ensuring faster approvals and reduced project timelines. Revise offset Policies to maximise technology transfer and industrial participation from foreign firms.
Collaborate with global aerospace firms to gain access to advanced research while ensuring knowledge transfer. Expand international collaborations and technology partnerships by pursuing joint development programs with global defence manufacturers, ensuring equitable technology and intellectual property sharing. Collaborate with friendly nations to co-develop fighter platforms suited to their requirements, such as light combat aircraft for smaller countries.
Provide diplomatic and financial support for promoting Indian fighter aircraft to foreign buyers, particularly in Asia, Africa, and South America. Ensure Indian platforms meet international quality and reliability standards to boost global confidence.
Leverage emerging technologies like AI and machine learning. Integrate AI for autonomous systems, combat decision-making, and predictive maintenance in fighter aircraft. Invest in hypersonic platforms to prepare for next-generation warfare. Adopt advanced manufacturing techniques like 3D printing and digital twins to reduce costs and improve precision.
Collaborate with academic institutions to create specialised programs in aerospace engineering and design. Establish dedicated training centers for skill development in aircraft production. Offer competitive incentives and research opportunities to prevent brain drain to other countries.
Establish a unified long-term vision for the users and defence manufacturing sectors to align production capabilities with future requirements. Ensure the production ecosystem is scalable to meet both domestic and export demands. Strengthen indigenous MRO facilities to reduce dependence on foreign firms to service advanced platforms.
Conclusion
India’s fighter aircraft production is at a critical juncture, with opportunities to emerge as a global aerospace hub. The way forward requires a balanced approach, combining indigenous innovation with strategic international collaborations. By fostering a strong industrial base, streamlining policies, and embracing emerging technologies, India can achieve its vision of self-reliance while contributing significantly to global defence markets.
“HAL and India’s Aerospace Journey” – HAL Publication. Documents HAL’s contributions to fighter aircraft production, including licensed and indigenous projects.
Stephen P. Cohen and Sunil Dasgupta, “Arming without Aiming: India’s Military Modernisation”. Discusses India’s strategic approach to defence modernisation and its implications for Indigenous aircraft development.
“Leapfrogging to Fifth-Generation Fighters: India’s AMCA Project”, Defence and Technology Review. Explains India’s leapfrog strategy in developing fifth-generation fighter aircraft.
“Building India’s Aerospace Ecosystem”, Brookings India. It focuses on the opportunities and challenges of creating a self-reliant aerospace industry.
Laxman Kumar Behera, “India’s Defence Industrial Base: The Role of Defence PSUs and Private Sector”. Explores the role of state-owned enterprises like HAL and private industry in defence manufacturing. Highlights challenges in India’s defence production ecosystem.
“Private Sector Participation in India’s Defence Production”, Vivekananda International Foundation. Explores the growing role of private companies in defence manufacturing.
“India’s Defence Industrial Corridors: A Game-Changer?” The Hindu. Evaluate the impact of Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh defence corridors on production capabilities.
“Make in India: Defence Manufacturing Sector”, Government of India. Overview of policies promoting Indigenous fighter aircraft production and other defence systems.
Kanti Bajpai, Harsh Pant, “India’s Defence and Security: Challenges and Strategies”. Provides insights into India’s defence production strategies, including fighter aircraft, and evaluates systemic challenges.
“Challenges in India’s Fighter Aircraft Development”, LiveMint. Discusses delays, quality control issues, and reliance on imports.
“Collaborations in Defence Manufacturing”, FICCI defence and Aerospace Division. Industry perspective on joint ventures and foreign collaborations in fighter aircraft development.
“Technology Transfers in Defence: A Case Study of India’s Fighter Jet Programs”, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). Examines India’s reliance on foreign technology and the scope for indigenisation.
“India’s Fighter Jet Ambitions: Lessons from Global Aerospace,” RAND Corporation. Compares India’s efforts with global benchmarks, offering insights into overcoming systemic challenges.
“India’s Defense Industrial Complex: Time for Reform”, Observer Research Foundation. Analyses India’s defence manufacturing ecosystem and recommendations for improvement.
Disclaimer:
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
