Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) Concept. MUM-T encompasses the collaborative operation of manned and unmanned systems across various platforms and domains. It can apply to ground, maritime, and air operations. MUM-T emphasises seamless interoperability between manned and unmanned systems, allowing them to work together effectively across various mission profiles. This concept can involve multiple unmanned systems (e.g., UAVs, unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), and unmanned surface vessels) working alongside manned platforms. MUM-T can encompass various mission types, such as surveillance, logistics, reconnaissance, and combat operations, providing commanders with various tactical options.
Loyal Wingman Concept. The loyal wingman concept refers specifically to unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that operate closely with manned fighter jets, providing support and augmenting their capabilities during missions. These UAVs are designed to act as “wingmen” to manned aircraft. Loyal wingman drones are typically designed to operate autonomously or semi-autonomously, often using AI to make real-time decisions. They can perform a variety of roles, including reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and strike missions, thus relieving manned aircraft of certain tasks. Loyal wingman drones are often expected to fly in close formation with manned fighters, providing tactical support and enhancing the mission’s overall combat effectiveness.
When comparing Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) and the Loyal Wingman concept head-to-head, both approaches leverage the collaboration between manned and unmanned systems but differ in their operational dynamics, levels of autonomy, and intended outcomes.
Mission Scope and Roles
MUM-T: In MUM-T, manned platforms directly command and control unmanned platforms to assist in various roles. MUM-T’s mission scope is broader, encompassing support and offensive capabilities. The Unmanned systems are typically extensions of the manned system’s sensors and weapons.
Loyal Wingman: Loyal Wingmen are designed to operate more autonomously, carrying out specific combat-related tasks, such as providing air support, engaging threats, or acting as decoys. They are essentially force multipliers, augmenting the combat power of the manned platform. These drones take on more combat-centric roles, where they can engage in offensive or defensive missions in coordination with human pilots.
Coordination/Control & Level of Autonomy
MUM-T: In MUM-T operations, unmanned systems rely more on direct control or at least supervision by the operator in the manned platform. The unmanned platforms can execute pre-programmed tasks but are generally controlled in real-time. The unmanned systems may not make complex decisions independently; instead, they execute commands provided by the manned platform. This keeps humans in the loop for crucial decision-making.
Loyal Wingman: The concept is based on a distributed coordination model. Loyal Wingmen are designed to operate with higher levels of autonomy. While they still collaborate with human pilots, they can make tactical decisions independently based on mission objectives and AI algorithms. They act like human wingmen, performing tasks such as engaging targets or defending the manned platform without the pilot’s constant input.
Primary Objectives
MUM-T: MUM-T focuses on enhancing situational awareness and extending operational reach. The unmanned systems help manned platforms by acting as force extenders—flying ahead to scout or gather intelligence, providing targeting data, or executing stand-off attacks to reduce risk to the human crew. The unmanned assets support and amplify the capabilities of the manned aircraft.
Loyal Wingman: Loyal Wingman focuses on amplifying combat effectiveness. The drones serve as partners in combat, providing additional firepower, protecting the manned platform, or taking on riskier roles like flying into heavily defended areas or serving as decoys. The objective is to have these drones work in combat formations, improving the lethality and survivability of the overall mission.
Combat Scenarios
MUM-T: Best suited for missions that involve complex battlefield management, including reconnaissance, data gathering, and precision strikes. It excels in operations where information dominance is critical and human decision-making is essential.
Loyal Wingman: More suited for frontline combat missions, where the wingman provides direct combat support and enhances the combat effectiveness of the manned platform. They can take on high-risk missions, allowing the manned aircraft to stay back and command from a safer distance.
While the loyal wingman focuses on the relationship between unmanned and manned aircraft, MUM-T provides a more expansive framework for integrating various platforms across different military domains. These concepts represent a shift toward more adaptive, resilient, and capable military forces. The loyal wingman concept and MUM-T are critical to the future of military operations, as they leverage technological advancements to enhance combat effectiveness.
Your valuable comments are most welcome.
For regular updates, please register your email here:-
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
My Article published on The EurasionTimes Website on 22 Oct 24.
China’s defence policies underscore its commitment to self-reliance and the relentless pursuit of advanced technology development, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign sources. The country’s defence industry, a critical component of its national strategy, stands as one of the largest and most advanced in the world. It is a testament to China’s significant investments in military modernisation and technological innovation, bolstering military readiness and asserting its global influence. The roots of China’s defence industry can be traced back to the 1950s, following the establishment of the People’s Republic of China. Over the decades, it has evolved from focusing on basic weaponry to a more sophisticated and diversified military production capability, with a strong emphasis on advanced technology. The industry is primarily state-owned and heavily regulated by the Chinese government.
Defence Aviation Industry. The military aviation sector is part of China’s broader defence industry and is critical for the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF). China’s military aviation industry has rapidly evolved over the past few decades, reflecting its growing emphasis on modernising its armed forces and enhancing its defence capabilities. The industry focuses on producing a range of military aircraft, including fighter jets, transport planes, helicopters, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The Chinese military has undertaken extensive modernisation efforts, including developing advanced fighter jets (Chengdu J-20 and J-31, fifth-generation stealth fighters). However, China faces several challenges in developing advanced fighter aircraft engines, which are critical for enhancing the capabilities of its military aviation.
Aero Engine Corporation of China. The Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) is a Chinese state-owned enterprise focused on developing, manufacturing, and servicing aircraft engines. It was officially established in August 2016 in response to China’s growing need to develop its indigenous aero-engine technology for military and civilian aircraft. The company merged parts of AVIC (Aviation Industry Corporation of China) and other related entities to consolidate China’s aerospace engine research, development, and production capabilities. Developing advanced Indigenous engines is a strategic priority for China, both for the defence sector and the expanding commercial aviation industry (e.g., China’s domestically developed C919 airliner). AECC aims to reduce China’s reliance on foreign engine manufacturers and to enhance China’s aerospace capabilities, especially in the context of its military modernisation and commercial aviation expansion.
Current State of Development. Historically, China has relied on foreign-sourced engines, and AECC is central to the effort to change that. AECC is focused on developing turbofan and turboprop engines for military jets, such as the WS-10 series (for fighter aircraft) and the WS-15 (for China’s next-generation stealth fighter). It is also developing high-bypass turbofan engines for commercial aircraft, aiming to rival global engine makers General Electric and Rolls-Royce.
WS-10 “Taihang” Engine. The 13-14 ton thrust WS-10, a product of several years of dedicated development, represents China’s first successful attempt at producing a modern turbofan engine for its advanced fighters. This achievement, intended for use in the J-10 and J-11 fighter jets, is a testament to China’s progress in engine development. While early versions faced reliability issues, newer variants, such as the WS-10B and WS-10C, have reportedly improved significantly in thrust and performance, instilling optimism about China’s future in aviation technology.
WS-13 “Tianshan” Engine. A turbofan engine (8.5-9 ton thrust), primarily designed for the FC-1/JF-17 fighter, a joint Chinese-Pakistani light fighter aircraft. The WS-13 is a lighter engine designed for smaller fighters and is an alternative to the Russian-made RD-93 engine used in earlier JF-17 models.
The WS-15 “Emei” Engine. A next-generation turbofan engine with an estimated 18 tons of thrust is a significant milestone in China’s fighter engine development. Designed to power the J-20 stealth fighter jet, the WS-15 is strategically important as it aims to provide the thrust and performance required for fifth-generation fighter jets, particularly for China’s J-20 stealth fighter. Its potential to achieve super cruise capability (sustained supersonic flight without afterburners) underscores the strategic implications of China’s advancements in fighter engine development. Despite facing delays and challenges in achieving the desired performance standards, the WS-15 represents a promising future for China’s military aviation capabilities (Timelines for the development of this engine are attached).
WS-18. It is a high-thrust turbofan engine for heavy transport aircraft like the Y-20 and may be used in future bomber or tanker aircraft. The WS-18 is intended to replace foreign engines in China’s large transport aircraft, such as the Y-20, which initially relied on Russian D-30KP engines.
WS-20 Engine. A high bypass turbofan engine designed for the Y-20 transport aircraft, the WS-20 represents another step in China’s efforts to enhance its engine technology and reduce reliance on imports.
China’s Challenges in Fighter Aircraft Engine Development. The complex process of developing reliable, high-performance aero engines presents a significant challenge for AECC. Multifaceted challenges encompassing technological, material, and geopolitical factors hinder China’s quest to catch up with global leaders in engine technology. While the country has made notable strides in recent years, overcoming these challenges is crucial for enhancing its military aviation capabilities and achieving greater self-sufficiency in defence technology.
Technological Challenges. Developing advanced jet engines involves advanced knowledge and complex engineering challenges, including materials science, aerodynamics, and thermodynamics. Achieving high thrust-to-weight ratios, fuel efficiency, and durability while maintaining stealth capabilities requires innovative design solutions, advanced materials, and cutting-edge technology that has taken years to develop.
Material Limitations. Engine components must withstand extreme temperatures and stresses. Developing high-performance materials that can endure these conditions is crucial. China needs to catch up in producing advanced alloys and composite materials required for next-generation engines. Advanced manufacturing methods, such as precision casting and 3D printing, are essential for creating complex engine parts. While China has progressed in this area, ensuring quality control remains challenging.
Reliability and Quality. Rigorous testing and quality assurance are vital to ensuring engine reliability. Despite advancements, Chinese engines have struggled with quality and reliability issues compared to their Western counterparts. Early versions of domestically produced engines, like the WS-10, experienced reliability issues that needed to be addressed through ongoing refinements and improvements. There have been concerns about durability and performance under extreme conditions.
Research and Development Challenges. Building a skilled workforce with expertise in aerospace engineering and related fields is critical. While China has many engineering graduates, there is a need for more specialised training and experience in aerospace propulsion systems. Although the Chinese government has significantly increased investments in aerospace R&D, various sectors still compete for resources. Prioritising engine development over other military technologies can be a challenge.
Dependency on Foreign Technology. Historically, China has relied on foreign technology and imports for advanced aircraft engines and critical engine components, especially from Russia. This dependency has limited China’s ability to develop fully indigenous capabilities in this crucial area. For instance, China’s early fighter jets, such as the J-11, used Russian engines (AL-31F), which affected operational independence. While efforts are underway to develop indigenous capabilities, breaking this dependency takes time. Attempts to acquire foreign technology through partnerships and joint ventures have often faced political hurdles, leading to limited access to advanced engine technologies.
Geopolitical Pressures. Geopolitical tensions, particularly with Western nations, lead to sanctions that limit China’s access to advanced aerospace technologies. This slows down development and innovation in the aviation sector. Competing with established aerospace powerhouses like the United States and Russia, which have decades of experience and technological advancements in engine development, poses another significant challenge.
Intellectual Property Concerns. Efforts to reverse-engineer foreign engines have raised intellectual property issues, leading to tensions with countries that view these actions as unfair competition.
Present Status. China has been making significant strides in developing indigenous fighter aircraft engines. The country aims to reduce its reliance on foreign-made engines, mainly from Russia, and to enhance its domestic military aviation capabilities. China’s fighter aircraft engine development has advanced significantly in recent years, reflecting the country’s growing ambitions in military aviation. Chinese engineers have made strides in materials science, advanced manufacturing techniques, and thrust vectoring technology, enhancing engine performance and reliability. China has sought to acquire foreign technology to bolster its capabilities. Collaborations with countries like Russia have facilitated knowledge transfer, especially in engine design and testing.
Future Prospects. China is likely to increase its investment in R&D to improve its engine technology further. The goal is to achieve greater self-sufficiency and enhance the performance of its fighter aircraft. The exploration of next-generation technologies, including AI-driven engine management systems, adaptive cycle engines, and environmentally sustainable fuels, could shape the future of Chinese military aviation. Developing advanced fighter aircraft engines is crucial for China’s military modernisation efforts. As tensions rise in the Asia-Pacific region, the ability to produce competitive engines will play a vital role in enhancing China’s defence capabilities.
Strategic Implications. China’s struggles with fighter aircraft engine development have strategic implications, particularly in its military modernisation efforts and aspirations to become a global aerospace leader. Achieving self-sufficiency in engine technology is crucial for ensuring operational independence and enhancing the capabilities of its air force. Continued efforts in this area will be essential for China to strengthen its military aviation capabilities and achieve its broader defence objectives.
Conclusion. China’s fighter aircraft engine development is critical to its broader military modernisation strategy. While significant progress has been made, ongoing challenges remain. The emphasis on indigenous production, technological innovation, and strategic partnerships will be essential for China to enhance its position in the global military aviation landscape. As the situation evolves, monitoring these developments will be crucial for understanding the implications for regional and global security dynamics.
Timeline of WS-15 Engine development.
Estimates vary on when WS-15 development began.
1990: Preliminary steps initiated.
2005: The blueprint for the WS-15 began to materialise
2006: A preliminary image of the WS-15 engine emerged five years before the J-20 prototype was unveiled.
2010: The first WS-15 prototypes entered the ground testing phase
2012: The full-scale demonstration project was completed , and extensive trials followed.
2013: The WS-15 development program started achieving significant milestones.
July 2018: The Chinese academic overseeing aviation engine R&D in Beijing, Liu Daxiang, announced that WS-15 development was progressing rapidly and would be fully completed within three years.
2019: The Russian AL-31 powering the J-20 was replaced by the domestic WS-10C engine.
2021: the WS-15 was nearing operational readiness.
2022: One WS-15 engine was flown on the jet along with another older version of the engine for testing purposes.
March 2023: The WS-15 engine achieved full operational capability. WS-15 project Chief Chang Young at the AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials announced at the 7th Chinese Aviation Innovation and Entrepreneurship Competition (CAIEC) that the WS-15 engine is now ready for mass production.
29th June 2023:Chengdu Aircraft Corporation (CAC) conducted the maiden flight of the new variant J-20 fighter, fitted with two WS-15 turbofan engines.
As of late August 2024, the Chinese WS-15 engine reportedly encounters several significant hurdles impacting its deployment and operational efficiency. One major issue involves supply chain disruptions related to the advanced alloys needed for the engine’s production.
Adnan Moussa, “China’s WS-15. Does it challenge US dominance over fighter jet engine tech?” aljundi.ae, 01 Dec 23.
Reuben Johnson, “China’s J-20 fighter seems to have a new homegrown engine, after years of struggle”, Air Warfare Global, 18 July 2023.
Boyko Nikolov, “F-22 rival Chinese J-20 may have overcome engine setbacks”, Bulgarianmilitary.com, 10 Sep 2024.
Alexander Holderness, Nicholas Velazquez, Jasmine Phillips, Gregory Sanders, and Cynthia Cook, “Powering Proliferation: The Global Engine Market and China’s Indigenisation” Brief CSIS, 21 Mar 2023.
Disclaimer:
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
Information and data included in the blog are for educational & non-commercial purposes only and have been carefully adapted, excerpted, or edited from reliable and accurate sources. All copyrighted material belongs to respective owners and is provided only for wider dissemination.
