<\/p>\n
Inputs to the questions posed by the Journalist.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q1. How’s the current Pahalgam crisis beneficial for the CCP’s South Asian agendas?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Pahalgam crisis indirectly serves the Chinese Communist Party\u2019s (CCP) strategic agendas in South Asia.<\/span><\/p>\n Weakening India\u2019s Regional Influence<\/u>. India, entangled in Kashmir-related conflicts, limits its ability to project power in South Asia, aligning with Beijing\u2019s goal of maintaining regional dominance.<\/span><\/p>\n Strengthening the China-Pakistan Alliance<\/u>. China\u2019s \u201call-weather\u201d partnership with Pakistan is a cornerstone of its South Asia strategy, particularly through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The crisis reinforces Pakistan\u2019s reliance on China, as Islamabad faces diplomatic and economic isolation from India\u2019s retaliatory measures, like trade restrictions and treaty suspensions. China\u2019s public support for Pakistan (evident in Foreign Minister Wang Yi\u2019s call for a \u201cswift and fair investigation\u201d into the attack and backing Pakistan\u2019s sovereignty) bolsters this alliance.<\/span><\/p>\n Exploiting Regional Instability<\/u>. The CCP benefits from controlled instability in South Asia, as it keeps India and Pakistan preoccupied with bilateral tensions rather than challenging China\u2019s regional projects, like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The Pahalgam crisis, by escalating border skirmishes and diplomatic hostilities, creates a volatile environment that diverts attention from China\u2019s activities in Nepal, Bangladesh, and the Indian Ocean.<\/span><\/p>\n Undermining India\u2019s Economic Narrative<\/u>. The Pahalgam attack has challenged India\u2019s narrative of stability and economic growth, particularly in Kashmir post-Article 370 revocation. This undermines India\u2019s appeal to foreign investors, a key CCP concern given India\u2019s role as a rival in attracting manufacturing post-U.S. tariffs on China.<\/span><\/p>\n Limiting U.S.-India Strategic Convergence<\/u>. The crisis occurs amid U.S. distractions, with President Trump\u2019s focus on trade wars and tariffs. By keeping India embroiled in a regional conflict, the CCP reduces the likelihood of deeper U.S.-India strategic alignment, which could counter China\u2019s influence.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q2. What’s behind China’s support for Pakistan on the Kashmir issue? Why is China supporting Pakistan’s call for an impartial probe into the April 22 attack?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n China\u2019s support for Pakistan on the Kashmir issue stems from a mix of strategic, geopolitical, and domestic considerations that align with Beijing\u2019s long-term regional agenda.<\/span><\/p>\n China\u2019s support for Pakistan on Kashmir is not just about friendship\u2014it\u2019s about undermining India strategically, protecting infrastructure interests, controlling regional narratives, and securing ideological consistency on separatism and counterterrorism.<\/span><\/p>\n The call for an \u201cimpartial probe\u201d is part of a larger strategy of positioning China as \u201cneutral\u201d while subtly backing Pakistan to complicate India\u2019s diplomatic standing.<\/span><\/p>\n Strategic Alliance with Pakistan (Counterbalance to India)<\/u>. China and Pakistan have a decades-long strategic alliance. Beijing views Islamabad as a critical counterweight to India in South Asia.<\/span><\/p>\n Protection of CPEC Interests<\/u>. CPEC passes through Gilgit-Baltistan, a region India claims as part of Jammu & Kashmir. India opposes this on sovereignty grounds. By backing Pakistan on Kashmir, China strengthens the legitimacy of its infrastructure investments in disputed territories. Also, any instability in Kashmir has a direct impact on the security of Chinese nationals and assets working in Pakistan-administered regions.<\/span><\/p>\n Diplomatic Leverage and Global Narrative Control<\/u>. By supporting an \u201cimpartial probe\u201d into the April 22 attack (in which Indian civilians were killed), China is deflecting attention from Pakistan-based terror groups, buying Islamabad diplomatic time.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q3. A hidden Huawei satellite phone has surfaced in the probe into the Pehalgam attack. What does it indicate? What’s the history of Chinese equipment in the Kashmir terrorism ecosystem?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The detection of a Huawei satellite phone near the attack site in Pahalgam\u2019s Baisaran Valley indicates the terrorists’ use of advanced communication tactics. The phone connects to China\u2019s satellite network, enabling secure, off-grid communication without reliance on local cellular networks. This capability allows operatives to evade Indian surveillance systems, which heavily monitor terrestrial networks.<\/span><\/p>\n Intelligence sources reportedly indicate the phone was active during the attack, suggesting its use for real-time coordination among attackers or with handlers across borders, possibly in Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n Encrypted Chinese messaging apps alongside the phone further point to a deliberate strategy to avoid detection, as these apps were banned in India post-2020 Galwan clash due to security concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n Huawei products are banned in India due to national security risks, meaning the phone was likely smuggled, possibly from Pakistan.<\/span><\/p>\n The phone\u2019s connection to Tiantong-1, a Chinese state-controlled network, raises questions about whether Chinese technology is being repurposed for terrorist activities, either deliberately or through illicit markets.<\/span><\/p>\n Chinese equipment has periodically surfaced in J&K\u2019s terrorism landscape, reflecting both the global proliferation of Chinese technology and targeted use by militant networks.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q4. What’s China’s agenda (not policy) today on Kashmir? With Turkey and China supporting Pakistan in the current crisis, how do you gauge the emerging geopolitical situation?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n China’s current agenda<\/em> on Kashmir\u2014distinct from its official policy\u2014is geopolitically opportunistic, destabilising in intent, and part of a broader strategy to constrain India\u2019s rise. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n It operates below the threshold of overt conflict but consistently supports Pakistan diplomatically, technologically, and in multilateral forums.<\/span><\/p>\n The support by both China and Turkey to Pakistan during the ongoing Pahalgam crisis indicates the emergence of a soft anti-India bloc seeking to leverage Kashmir as a pressure point.<\/span><\/p>\n While China\u2019s official policy is neutrality and calls for bilateral resolution, its agenda<\/em> is about instrumentalising Kashmir to box in India strategically and diplomatically.<\/span><\/p>\n Turkey has emerged as a loud voice on Kashmir, echoing Pakistan\u2019s positions at the UN and OIC. Turkey\u2019s support complements China\u2019s involvement. This triad works to internationalise Kashmir, delegitimise Indian control, and challenge India\u2019s secular-democratic image.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q5. Was the attack timed with the development of the India-US trade deal? It diverted the whole world’s attention from Trump’s trade tariff war to Kashmir! Was it to thwart the US trade war with China?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n April 22, 2025’s timing has sparked speculation about its alignment with geopolitical developments, particularly the India-US trade deal negotiations and the escalating US-China trade war under President Donald Trump\u2019s tariff policies.<\/span><\/p>\n The timing of the attack, during Vance\u2019s visit and amid trade negotiations, suggests a possible intent to maximise disruption.<\/span><\/p>\n The choice of Pahalgam, a tourist destination, ensured global media coverage, potentially overshadowing trade discussions.<\/span><\/p>\n The attack dominated Indian and international headlines and undeniably shifted global media and diplomatic focus to Kashmir, at least temporarily. It did not \u201ceclipse\u201d the trade war but added a parallel crisis, particularly in South Asia, where India-Pakistan tensions dominated regional discourse.<\/span><\/p>\n The attack significantly diverted attention to Kashmir, particularly in India and among its partners, but it did not entirely overshadow the US-China trade war globally.<\/span><\/p>\n The attack aligns with China\u2019s interest in disrupting India\u2019s US trade alignment, but lacks evidence of direct Chinese intent. It likely served Pakistan\u2019s goals while indirectly benefiting China\u2019s agenda.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Q6. Other relevant aspects?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Pakistan\u2019s military and government are grappling with economic woes and political unrest, exacerbated by India\u2019s trade restrictions and diplomatic isolation. Supporting militant proxies may be a way to deflect domestic criticism. However, this is a foolish mistake, and domestic pressures could push both nations toward miscalculation.<\/span><\/p>\n The crisis\u2019s economic fallout extends beyond India and Pakistan, affecting volatile global markets. India\u2019s trade restrictions and border closures further damage Pakistan’s already strained economy, increasing its reliance on China\u2019s financial support.<\/span><\/p>\n The India-Pakistan-China nuclear dynamic raises the stakes. While restraint is being held, the crisis tests this balance.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Link to the article by Venus Upadhayaya on The Epoch Times (Quoted four times):-<\/span><\/p>\n